Saving and sharing dashboard views | Learn Danish in English

Sentence explanations

1. Jeg vil gerne have, at dashboardet gemmer tilpassede visninger.

   I would like the dashboard to save custom views.

   Jeg vil gerne have

   I would like

   dashboardet

   the dashboard

   gemmer

   saves

   tilpassede

   custom

   visninger

   views

   More detail

   Jeg vil gerne have is a reusable Danish pattern for expressing a wish or request: Jeg vil gerne have, at ... = “I would like ... to ...”. vil is the present form of ville (“want/would like”), gerne adds the meaning “gladly” and makes the wish sound natural, and have is the infinitive after vil. The following at introduces a subordinate clause with its own finite verb; here it is not the infinitive marker, because gemmer is a finite present-tense form. dashboardet means “the dashboard”. The noun dashboard has the definite singular ending -et here. This ending marks a singular definite noun; it does not itself identify which dashboard beyond the context. gemmer is the present form of gemme, “to save” or “to store”. In this sentence, the dashboard is the subject that performs the saving. Example: Programmet gemmer filen. — “The program saves the file.” tilpassede means “custom” or “customized” here. It is the form of the adjective tilpasset used with a plural or definite noun. The form does not show a masculine/feminine distinction in this use; the plural noun visninger supplies the relevant agreement context. visninger means “views” in this context. It is the plural of visning, a view or display. Example: Jeg gemmer mine visninger. — “I save my views.” Together, at dashboardet gemmer tilpassede visninger says “that the dashboard saves custom views”. The complete utterance therefore means “I would like the dashboard to save custom views.”

2. Flere brugere har bedt om en måde at beholde deres sædvanlige opsætning på.

   Several users have asked for a way to keep their usual setup.

   Flere

   several

   brugere

   users

   har bedt om

   have asked for

   en måde

   a way

   beholde

   keep

   deres

   their

   sædvanlige

   usual

   opsætning

   setup

   More detail

   Flere means “several” here and is used with a plural noun. Compare flere brugere (“several users”) with flere used on its own when the noun is understood. It does not identify an exact number. brugere is the plural of bruger (“user”). The ending -e marks this plural form. In this sentence, it is the subject of the request. har bedt om is a useful perfect-tense construction meaning “have asked for.” har is the present form of have, used here as an auxiliary, and bedt is the past participle of bede (“ask”). The preposition om belongs with this use of bede: bede om noget means “ask for something.” Example: Hun har bedt om hjælp. — “She has asked for help.” en måde means “a way” or “a method.” måde is a common-gender noun, so the indefinite article is en; the article does not by itself assert a numerical count. The phrase introduces the way being requested. beholde is the infinitive of “keep” or “retain.” It follows the infinitive marker at in en måde at beholde ... på (“a way to keep ...”). In Danish, beholde means continuing to have or retain something, whereas holde more generally means “hold” and can describe physically holding something or maintaining a position. deres means “their.” It is a third-person plural possessive form. It does not change according to the gender or number of the thing possessed: for example, deres opsætning is “their setup,” while deres visninger is “their views.” The sentence identifies the users as the possessors but does not otherwise specify the users individually. sædvanlige means “usual” in this sentence. Its base form is sædvanlig; sædvanlige is the form used with a plural noun or in a definite noun phrase. Example: den sædvanlige opsætning — “the usual setup.” opsætning means “setup” or “configuration.” It is a singular common-gender noun, shown here after en: en opsætning. Its plural is opsætninger. In this context it refers to the arrangement or configuration the users normally use. The full pattern is Flere brugere har bedt om en måde at beholde deres sædvanlige opsætning på: “Several users have asked for a way to keep their usual setup.” In en måde at beholde ... på, at introduces the infinitive clause and på appears at its end; together they form the Danish pattern for “a way to do something.”

3. At skifte filtre igen og igen spilder tid under de ugentlige gennemgange.

   Switching filters repeatedly wastes time during weekly reviews.

   skifte

   switch

   filtre

   filters

   igen og igen

   repeatedly

   spilder

   wastes

   tid

   time

   ugentlige

   weekly

   gennemgange

   reviews

   More detail

   skifte is the infinitive “to switch.” Here, together with filtre, it forms the subject At skifte filtre: “switching filters.” Danish commonly uses at plus an infinitive when an action is treated as a subject. Example: At læse hjælper. — “Reading helps.” filtre means “filters” here. It is the plural indefinite form of filter: et filter → filtre. Example: Jeg skifter filtre. — “I change filters.” igen og igen is a repeated adverbial expression meaning “again and again” or “repeatedly.” It emphasizes that the switching happens multiple times, rather than only once. spilder means “wastes” here. It is the present-tense form of spilde, and its subject is the singular action At skifte filtre, not the plural noun filtre. Example: Det spilder tid. — “It wastes time.” tid means “time.” In this sentence it is an uncounted resource, as in the reusable expression spilde tid — “waste time.” ugentlige means “weekly.” It is the definite/plural form of the adjective ugentlig, agreeing with the plural noun phrase de ugentlige gennemgange. Example: de daglige opgaver — “the daily tasks.” gennemgange means “reviews” here. It is the plural form of gennemgang, “review.” With de, the phrase de ugentlige gennemgange means “the weekly reviews,” so the reviews are treated as specific ones in the situation. The full structure is At skifte filtre (“switching filters”) + spilder tid (“wastes time”) + under de ugentlige gennemgange (“during the weekly reviews”). Together: “Switching filters repeatedly wastes time during weekly reviews.”

4. Gemte visninger kunne gøre den rutine hurtigere.

   Saved views could make that routine faster.

   Gemte

   saved

   visninger

   views

   kunne

   could

   gøre

   make

   den

   that

   rutine

   routine

   hurtigere

   faster

   More detail

   Gemte means “saved” here and describes visninger. It is the plural/definite attributive form related to the past participle gemt of gemme (“to save”): gemt is used with a singular indefinite common-gender noun, while gemte is used with a plural or definite noun phrase. The form itself does not say who saved the views. visninger is the plural of visning (“view”). The singular is en visning, the indefinite plural is visninger, and the definite plural is visningerne. Here it refers to views as in the supplied translation. kunne is the preterite form of the modal verb kunne (“can; be able to”). In this sentence, with the fixed translation, it conveys “could,” presenting the effect as possible rather than definite. A modal is followed by an infinitive: kunne gøre means “could make.” gøre is the infinitive “to make” here. In the pattern gøre + object + adjective, it means “make [the object] [adjective]”: gøre rutinen hurtigere means “make the routine faster.” Its infinitive form follows the modal kunne. den is a singular common-gender demonstrative/article form. Together with rutine, it means “that” in “that routine.” Danish can also mark definiteness by attaching the ending -en to a common-gender noun, as in rutinen (“the routine”); that is a different construction from den rutine. rutine means “routine.” It is singular and indefinite in form. With the attached definite ending, it becomes rutinen. Here it is the object whose resulting state is described by hurtigere. hurtigere is the comparative form of hurtig (“fast; quick”). The useful chain is hurtig → hurtigere → hurtigst (“fast” → “faster” → “fastest”). After gøre, the comparative describes the resulting state of the routine: “faster.” Together, Gemte visninger is the subject, kunne gøre expresses a possible effect, and den rutine hurtigere gives the object and its resulting quality. The whole utterance means: “Saved views could make that routine faster.”

5. Det ville være nyttigt, hvis visninger kunne deles med teammedlemmer.

   It would be useful if views could be shared with teammates.

   Det

   it

   ville være

   would be

   nyttigt

   useful

   hvis

   if

   visninger

   views

   kunne deles

   could be shared

   med

   with

   teammedlemmer

   teammates

   More detail

   Det is a neuter singular pronoun. In this sentence it works as an anticipatory subject: the following hvis-clause supplies what would be useful, rather than det naming a specific object. The pronoun points to the proposed situation as a whole. ville være combines ville with the infinitive være. Here ville is the past-tense form of vil, used for a hypothetical or conditional statement, and være means “be.” The pattern det ville være ... is a reusable way to say “it would be ...”. For example: Det ville være bedre. — “It would be better.” nyttigt means “useful” here. It is the neuter singular form of the adjective nyttig, agreeing with det; the form is not an inflection of the nearby clause. Compare en nyttig idé — “a useful idea” — with et nyttigt værktøj — “a useful tool.” hvis introduces a condition: “if.” It starts the situation whose possible result is described by Det ville være nyttigt. Example: Hvis det virker, er det nyttigt. — “If it works, it is useful.” visninger means “views” in this context. Its base form is the singular noun visning; visninger is the plural form. The noun is indefinite here: it refers to views without marking them as a previously identified set. kunne deles expresses “could be shared.” kunne is the past-tense form of the modal verb kan/kunne, used here to express possibility in the hypothetical situation. deles is the passive form of dele (“share”): the views receive the action, while the sentence does not specify who would share them. The pattern kunne + passive form is reusable for “could be [done].” Example: Filerne kunne deles. — “The files could be shared.” med is the preposition “with” and links the sharing to the teammates. teammedlemmer means “teammates” or “team members.” It is the plural of teammedlem, a compound noun made from team and medlem. The plural ending is on the full noun: teammedlem → teammedlemmer. Taken together, Det ville være nyttigt says “It would be useful,” and hvis visninger kunne deles med teammedlemmer specifies the hypothetical condition: “if views could be shared with teammates.” The complete meaning is therefore: “It would be useful if views could be shared with teammates.”

6. Deling ville kræve regler for tilladelser, så vi kunne behandle det separat.

   Sharing would need permission rules, so we could treat it separately.

   Deling

   sharing

   ville

   would

   kræve

   require

   regler

   rules

   tilladelser

   permissions

   så

   so

   vi kunne

   we could

   behandle

   treat

   det

   it

   separat

   separately

   More detail

   Deling means “sharing” here. It is a noun formed from the verb dele (“share”), and it names the activity as a topic. Example: Deling af filer kan være praktisk. — “Sharing files can be practical.” ville is the preterite form of the modal verb vil and gives the hypothetical “would” meaning here. In this sentence, ville kræve means “would require.” kræve is the infinitive “to require.” After the modal ville, Danish uses the infinitive without an English-style “to”: ville kræve — “would require.” regler means “rules.” It is the plural of regel (“rule”), so it refers to more than one rule in this sentence. tilladelser means “permissions” or “authorizations.” It is the plural of tilladelse (“permission”). The phrase regler for tilladelser means “rules for permissions”: for links the rules to what they regulate. så means “so” here and introduces the result of the preceding statement. vi kunne means “we could.” vi is the first-person plural pronoun “we,” while kunne is the preterite form of the modal verb kan (“can”). In this context, kunne expresses a possible action rather than simple past ability. behandle means “to treat” or “to handle.” After kunne, it remains in the infinitive: kunne behandle — “could treat.” det is a neuter singular pronoun meaning “it” in this sentence. Its grammatical form is neuter singular; the supplied sentence does not uniquely identify a more specific referent. separat means “separately” here, describing how the treatment would happen. The same form is also used as the adjective “separate”; in this sentence it has an adverbial function. Together, Deling ville kræve regler for tilladelser means “Sharing would require rules for permissions.” The connector så then introduces the result: vi kunne behandle det separat, “we could treat it separately.” The whole utterance therefore means: “Sharing would need permission rules, so we could treat it separately.”

7. Selv en personlig version ville løse det meste af mit problem.

   Even a personal version would solve most of my problem.

   Selv

   even

   personlig

   personal

   version

   version

   ville

   would

   løse

   solve

   det meste

   most

   mit

   my

   problem

   problem

   More detail

   Selv means “even” here and marks en personlig version as an unexpectedly sufficient possibility. Example: Selv en lille ændring hjælper. — “Even a small change helps.” personlig describes version. It is the common-gender singular form; compare personligt with a neuter singular noun and personlige in plural or definite contexts. Example: et personligt valg — “a personal choice.” version is the noun “version.” In this sentence it is a common-gender singular noun, shown by en version; its definite form is versionen, and its plural is versioner. ville is the form of vil used here for “would,” together with the infinitive løse. This construction presents the solving as a hypothetical or conditional result, not as an asserted fact. Example: Det ville hjælpe. — “It would help.” løse is the infinitive “solve.” After ville, Danish uses the infinitive without at: ville løse means “would solve.” The form løser is a present-tense form, while løste is a past-tense form. det meste means “most” or “the greater part.” In the expression det meste af ..., meste is the form used in this noun-like expression. The comparison chain is meget (“much/many”), mere (“more”), mest (“most”); det meste is the corresponding “most part” expression. Here det meste af mit problem means “most of my problem.” mit means “my” before a neuter singular noun. The noun problem is neuter, so Danish uses mit; compare min before a common-gender singular noun and mine before plural nouns. Example: mit hus — “my house,” but min bog — “my book.” problem means “problem.” It is a neuter noun: et problem, definite problemet, plural problemer. In the sentence, mit problem means “my problem.” Together, en personlig version is “a personal version,” ville løse is “would solve,” and det meste af mit problem is “most of my problem.” The complete utterance therefore means: “Even a personal version would solve most of my problem.”

8. Så kunne det første skridt fokusere på private, gemte visninger.

   Then the first step could focus on private saved views.

   Så

   then

   kunne

   could

   det

   the

   første

   first

   skridt

   step

   fokusere på

   focus on

   private

   private

   gemte

   saved

   visninger

   views

   More detail

   Så means “then” here and is placed first to connect this proposal to what came before. With a fronted adverb like Så, Danish main-clause word order commonly places the finite verb next: Så kunne ... (“Then ... could ...”). kunne is the modal form corresponding here to “could,” expressing a possible or suggested action. It is the past-tense form of kan; the infinitive is also kunne. Danish modal verbs do not change for the subject in this construction. A modal is followed by an infinitive: kunne fokusere = “could focus.” In another context, kunne can also describe ability, but the fixed translation supports possibility here. det første skridt is the noun phrase “the first step.” det is the neuter singular definite article used before an adjective and noun in a definite neuter singular noun phrase. It is not itself a numeric word. første is the ordinal “first,” related to først; in this phrase it identifies the step’s order. skridt means “step.” Its singular indefinite form is et skridt, while its plural is also skridt; the definite forms are skridtet (“the step”) and skridtene (“the steps”). Example: Det første skridt er lille. — “The first step is small.” This shows the same pattern det + ordinal/adjective + noun for a definite neuter singular noun phrase. fokusere på is the reusable verb pattern “focus on.” fokusere is the infinitive after the modal, and på introduces what receives the focus. Example: Vi fokuserer på problemet. — “We focus on the problem.” The subject and tense can change, while the preposition remains part of this verb pattern. private describes visninger as “private.” It is the plural form of the adjective privat; the adjective takes private with a plural noun. Example: Jeg bruger private visninger. — “I use private views.” gemte means “saved” here. It is the attributive form of the participle/adjective related to gemme (“save”): gemme → gemt in the basic participle form, with gemte used before a plural or definite noun phrase such as visninger. Do not confuse this with the past-tense form gemte of the verb gemme; the surrounding noun phrase makes the descriptive reading relevant here. Example: Jeg har gemt visningen. — “I have saved the view.” visninger means “views” in the supplied interface-related meaning. Its singular is visning, and visninger is its plural form. Example: En visning er åben. — “A view is open.” Together, Så kunne gives “Then ... could,” det første skridt gives “the first step,” and fokusere på private, gemte visninger gives “focus on private, saved views.” The whole utterance therefore means: “Then the first step could focus on private saved views.” The comma separates the two descriptions private and gemte, both modifying visninger.