Understanding performance evaluation and early feedback | Learn Japanese in English

Japanese lesson set in a contemporary Tokyo everyday setting: In a job interview, a candidate asks how performance is evaluated and how early expectations and feedback are communicated..

EN → JA / Level: B2

10 minutes free every day

Continue audio lessons in the app

Word explanations appear automatically in sync with the audio.

No login required · synced translations · playback with the screen locked

Choose your learning language and open this lesson in the app.

Kotobridge app audio lesson and word notes

About This Lesson

Use Understanding performance evaluation and early feedback to practice Japanese conversation, pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and quizzes.

Dialogue

A

ここで業績がどのように評価されるのか理解したいです。

koh-KOH deh gyoh-SEH-kee gah doh-NOH YOH-nee hyoh-KAH sah-reh-ROO noh kah ree-KAI shee-TAI dess I would like to understand how performance is evaluated here.
B

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

hyoh-KAH deh wah, seh-KOH, kyoh-RYOH-koo shee-TEH hah-RAH-koo chee-KAR-ah, soh-SHEE-teh han-DAN noh shee-tsuh gah koh-RYOH sah-reh-MAHS Reviews consider outcomes, collaboration, and the quality of judgment.
A

そのバランスは重要です。成果だけでは、誤解を招くことがあるからです。

soh-NOH bah-RAHN-soo wah joo-YOH dess. seh-KOH dah-keh deh-wah, goh-KAI oh mah-NEH-koo koh-TOH gah ah-ROO kah-rah dess That balance matters, because output alone can be misleading.
B

意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合、速さだけを評価することは避けています。

EE-shee keh-tsu-TEH gah ah-TOH nee nah-TTEH moh-NDAI oh uh-MOO bah-AI, hah-yah-SAH dah-keh oh hyoh-KAH soo-ROO koh-TOH wah sah-keh-TEH ee-MAHS We try to avoid rewarding speed when decisions create later problems.
A

入社したばかりの人には、どのように期待が伝えられますか。

nyoo-SHAH shee-TAH bah-kah-REE noh HEE-toh nee-wah, doh-NOH YOH-nee kee-TAI gah tsu-tah-eh-rah-reh-MAHS kah How are expectations communicated when someone first starts?
B

マネージャーが節目となる目標を設定し、その後、状況がより明確になるにつれて調整します。

mah-neh-JAH gah foo-shee-MEH toh-NAH-roo moh-koo-HYOH oh seh-TEH shee, soh-NOH ah-TOH, joh-KYOH gah YOH-ree meh-KAK-koo nee-NAH-roo nee-tsu-reh-TEH choh-SEH shee-MAHS Managers set milestones, then adjust them as context becomes clearer.
A

フィードバックが早い段階で届くのであれば、現実的だと思います。

FEE-doh-bahk-koo gah hah-yah-EE dan-KAI deh toh-DOH-koo noh-deh ah-reh-BAH, gen-jee-tsu-TEH-kee dah toh oh-moh-ee-MAHS That sounds practical, as long as feedback arrives early.
B

早い段階でのフィードバックは期待されており、正式な評価のときだけに限られるものではありません。

hah-yah-EE dan-KAI deh noh FEE-doh-bahk-koo wah kee-TAI sah-reh-TEH oh-REE, say-SHEE-kee nah hyoh-KAH noh toh-KEE dah-keh nee kah-gee-rah-reh-ROO moh-NOH deh-wah ah-ree-MAHS-en Early feedback is expected, not reserved for formal reviews.

Sentence explanations

  1. ここで業績がどのように評価されるのか理解したいです。

    I would like to understand how performance is evaluated here.

    ここで
    here
    業績
    performance
    どのように
    how
    評価される
    be evaluated
    理解したいです
    would like to understand
    More detail

    ここで means “here,” identifying the setting in which the evaluation takes place. ここ is the demonstrative for a nearby place or situation, and で marks the place or setting of an action or event. For example, ここで働いています。 means “I work here.” 業績 refers here to a person’s or organization’s performance, understood through the supplied translation. Depending on context, it can also refer to achievements or results, but this sentence uses it as what is evaluated. It is a noun and does not itself show number or tense. どのように asks “how” or “in what way,” focusing on the manner or method. It introduces the manner of evaluation here. A related, more conversational form is どう; for example, どう評価されますか。 means “How is it evaluated?” 評価される means “be evaluated” here. The base verb is 評価する, “to evaluate,” and 評価される is its passive form: the performance is the thing receiving the evaluation. The nonpast form presents the evaluation process generally, rather than locating it at a specific past time. For example, 成果が評価されます。 means “Results are evaluated” or “Results are valued,” depending on context. The following context makes the evaluation criteria concrete, but the form itself does not state which criteria are used. 理解したいです expresses a polite wish to understand. Its base verb is 理解する, “to understand”; 理解したい adds たい to the verb’s stem, giving “want to understand,” and です makes the statement polite. Thus, this form presents the speaker’s wish rather than a bare statement that they already understand. For example, 仕組みを理解したいです。 means “I would like to understand the system.” Together, ここで業績がどのように評価されるのか is an embedded question: “how performance is evaluated here.” The のか ending packages that question as the content of understanding. Adding 理解したいです gives the complete meaning: “I would like to understand how performance is evaluated here.”

  2. 評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

    Reviews consider outcomes, collaboration, and the quality of judgment.

    評価
    evaluation; review
    成果
    outcomes
    協力して働く
    work collaboratively
    力
    ability
    判断
    judgment
    質
    quality
    考慮されます
    are considered
    More detail

    評価 means “evaluation” or “review.” Here, 評価では sets the context: “in the evaluation/review.” The particle では marks the situation or framework being discussed. The related verb 評価する means “to evaluate,” while 評価される means “to be evaluated.” 成果 means “outcomes” or “results”—the results produced by work. It is a noun and can be used in compounds such as 成果を上げる (“produce results”). In this sentence, it is one item being considered. 協力して働く means “work collaboratively.” 協力して is the て-form of 協力する (“cooperate”), linking that action with 働く (“work”). The pattern AしてB can connect actions: 確認して答える means “check and answer.” 力 means “ability” or “capacity.” In 協力して働く力, it is the ability to work collaboratively, not physical strength. Japanese often places a descriptive phrase before 力, as in 考える力 (“thinking ability”). 判断 means “judgment” or “decision-making.” The noun can also appear in 判断する, “to judge” or “make a decision.” Here it refers to the quality of judgment rather than to one specific decision. 質 means “quality.” The pattern Nの質 means “the quality of N,” so 判断の質 means “the quality of judgment.” This の links the noun 判断 to the noun 質; 質 is the word that expresses the quality being assessed. 考慮されます means “is/are considered.” The base verb is 考慮する (“take into consideration”); 考慮されます is its polite passive form. The passive presents the listed items as things that receive consideration. The polite ending ます gives the statement a formal, neutral tone. In this sentence, the plural English subject “outcomes, collaboration, and the quality of judgment” is represented by the coordinated noun phrases before the verb; Japanese does not require a separate plural marker here. Putting the parts together, 評価では establishes the review as the setting, 成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質 lists the three aspects, and 考慮されます states what happens to them. The complete meaning is: “Reviews consider outcomes, collaboration, and the quality of judgment.”

  3. そのバランスは重要です。成果だけでは、誤解を招くことがあるからです。

    That balance matters, because output alone can be misleading.

    その
    that
    バランス
    balance
    重要です
    is important
    成果
    results; output
    だけでは
    with ... alone
    誤解を招く
    be misleading
    ことがある
    can sometimes happen
    からです
    because
    More detail

    その is an attributive demonstrative meaning “that” before a noun. Its grammatical form does not identify the specific referent by itself; here the translation supports “that balance.” Example: その方法は簡単です。 — “That method is easy.” バランス is a noun meaning “balance.” It is a loanword used for an appropriate or important combination of factors. Here it refers to the balance relevant to evaluating outcomes together with collaboration and judgment, rather than outcomes alone. 重要です means “is important” here. The adjective 重要 is a na-adjective, and です gives the sentence a polite present form: 重要だ is the plain form, while 重要です is polite. Example: 協力は重要です。 — “Cooperation is important.” 成果 is a noun meaning “results,” “outcomes,” or “output.” In this sentence, “output” is the intended sense supplied by the translation. Example: 成果を確認します。 — “I will check the results.” だけでは combines だけ (“only”) with では, marking a condition or topic in contrast. 成果だけでは therefore presents “output alone” as an insufficient basis for the result that follows. This is not a claim about a numeric amount; it means that considering only the output is not enough. Example: 価格だけでは判断できません。 — “You cannot decide based on price alone.” 誤解を招く is a verb construction meaning “to be misleading” or, more literally, “to lead to misunderstanding.” The verb is 招く, whose base form is also 招く; in this form it modifies the following nominalized clause. Example: その説明は誤解を招きます。 — “That explanation is misleading.” ことがある follows a verb in its plain form and says that the event can occur or sometimes occurs. Here 誤解を招くことがある means “can be misleading,” without saying that it is always misleading. The noun こと turns the preceding event into something that can be described as occurring. Example: この方法は時間がかかることがあります。 — “This method can sometimes take time.” からです gives the reason for the preceding statement: “because ...” The polite explanatory ending is からです; a less formal version is からだ. Here it presents the possibility of misleading impressions as the reason that the balance matters. Taken together, そのバランスは重要です says “That balance is important.” 成果だけでは sets up the contrast “with output alone,” and 誤解を招くことがあるからです gives the reason: output alone can sometimes lead to misunderstanding. The complete meaning is: “That balance matters, because output alone can be misleading.”

  4. 意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合、速さだけを評価することは避けています。

    We try to avoid rewarding speed when decisions create later problems.

    意思決定
    decision-making
    後になって
    later on
    問題を生む
    create problems
    場合
    case; when
    速さ
    speed
    だけを
    only
    評価する
    evaluate; value
    避けています
    try to avoid
    More detail

    意思決定 means “decision-making” or “a decision,” depending on context. It is a noun; in this sentence, が marks it as the subject of the clause. Japanese often leaves the actor who makes the decision unstated when the context makes it unnecessary. 後になって means “later on” or “afterward.” The form なって is the て-form of なる (“become”), but this expression is used as a time expression: after some time has passed. Compare 後で (“later”) with 後になって, which more strongly suggests that a later consequence or discovery emerges. 問題を生む means “create problems.” 生む is the nonpast form of the verb 生む, “to produce” or “give rise to”; here it is not the related verb 産む, which is used for giving birth or laying eggs. The object marker を shows that 問題 is what is produced. Example: 誤解を生む means “create a misunderstanding.” 場合 means “case” and, after a clause, forms a pattern meaning “when” or “in cases where.” Thus 意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合 is “when decision-making creates problems later.” The clause before 場合 describes the condition; it does not assert that every decision actually has this result. 速さ means “speed.” The noun is formed from the adjective 速い (“fast”) with -さ, which turns a degree or quality into a noun. This differs from 速度, a more technical or measured word for speed. Here 速さ refers to how quickly something is done. だけを combines だけ (“only”) with を, the object marker. It limits the object of the following action: “speed alone” or “only speed.” The phrase does not itself say that there is a numerical quantity; it says that speed is the sole aspect being selected. Example: 価格だけを見る means “look only at the price.” 評価する is the nonpast form of 評価する, “evaluate,” “assess,” or “value.” In this context, it means judging something positively as a criterion, so “rewarding speed” is a natural translation. The form する is part of this verb and is not an auxiliary attached to a separate verb. With こと, the clause 速さだけを評価すること is nominalized: “evaluating speed alone.” 避けています comes from 避ける (“avoid, steer clear of”) plus the て-form 避けて and います. This combination commonly describes an ongoing practice or policy, so here it means “are avoiding” or, naturally, “try to avoid.” The polite ending ます makes the statement suitable for a professional conversation. The grammatical subject is omitted; the fixed translation identifies the intended subject as “we.” The structure is [意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合]、[速さだけを評価すること]は[避けています]. The first part sets the condition: when decisions lead to later problems. The second part makes “evaluating speed alone” the topic with は, and 避けています states the ongoing policy toward that action. Together, the utterance means: “When decisions create problems later, we try to avoid rewarding speed alone.”

  5. 入社したばかりの人には、どのように期待が伝えられますか。

    How are expectations communicated when someone first starts?

    入社したばかり
    just joined the company
    人
    person
    どのように
    how
    期待
    expectations
    伝えられますか
    are communicated?
    More detail

    入社したばかり describes someone who has only recently joined a company. Its base verb is 入社する “to join a company”; 入社した is its past form, and ばかり after a past form means “just recently.” The pattern [verb-past]ばかりの[person/noun] is reusable for “a person or thing that has just ….” 人 means “person.” Here, 入社したばかりの人 is the noun phrase “a person who has just joined the company.” The の connects that description to 人. どのように means “how” or “in what way.” It asks about the manner or method of an action. For example, どのように説明しますか。 means “How do you explain it?” 期待 means “expectations” in this sentence. It is a noun; with 期待が it is marked as the thing that is conveyed. The particle が identifies the subject of the conveying expression here. 伝えられますか uses the verb 伝える, “to convey” or “to communicate.” 伝えられる is the passive form, so the expectations are presented as the thing communicated rather than as the communicator. ますか makes the question polite. Thus, 期待が伝えられますか asks whether or how expectations are communicated. The passive pattern [thing]が[person]に伝えられる can be reused for “the thing is communicated to the person”; the communicator need not be stated. In 入社したばかりの人には, に marks the person as the target or recipient, while は gives that marked phrase topic or contrastive prominence. Together with the following question, it means “for people who have just joined the company.” The full structure is 入社したばかりの人には “for people who have just joined the company” + どのように “how” + 期待が “expectations” + 伝えられますか “are communicated?” The complete meaning is: “How are expectations communicated when someone first starts?”

  6. マネージャーが節目となる目標を設定し、その後、状況がより明確になるにつれて調整します。

    Managers set milestones, then adjust them as context becomes clearer.

    マネージャー
    manager
    節目となる
    serve as a milestone
    目標
    goal
    設定し
    set
    その後
    after that
    状況
    situation
    より明確
    clearer
    なる
    become
    につれて
    as … changes
    調整します
    adjust
    More detail

    マネージャー means “manager” here. Japanese nouns generally do not mark singular versus plural, so the plural meaning “managers” comes from the fixed translation and context rather than from a plural ending. The following が marks this noun as the subject of the clause. 節目となる describes something that serves as an important point or milestone. 節目 is a milestone or turning point, and となる is a somewhat formal pattern meaning “become” or “serve as.” In this sentence it modifies 目標: a goal that serves as a milestone. 目標 means “goal” or “target.” A useful contrast is 目的, “purpose”: 目標 is a goal to reach, while 目的 is the broader aim behind an action. 設定し comes from 設定する, “to set” or “establish.” The し form connects this action to what follows: 目標を設定し、… means “set goals and then …” It is not the polite ending here; the polite form appears later in 調整します. その後 means “after that” or “subsequently.” It explicitly places the next action after the goal-setting action. 状況 means “situation” or “circumstances.” In this sentence it is the situation or context whose clarity changes. The noun can be used broadly, for example: 状況を確認する — “check the situation.” より明確 means “clearer” or “more clearly,” depending on the construction. より marks a higher degree, and 明確 means “clear” or “well-defined.” With an adjective such as 明確な, the comparison can be expressed as より明確な情報, “clearer information.” Here it combines with なる to describe the situation becoming clearer. なる means “become” or “come to be.” The relevant pattern is N が A に なる: “N becomes A.” Thus, in the surrounding text, 状況がより明確になる means “the situation becomes clearer.” なる is the base form; the polite nonpast form is なります. につれて introduces a linked change: “as … changes” or “as … progresses.” The pattern A につれて B means that B changes along with A. Here 状況がより明確になるにつれて means “as the situation becomes clearer.” 調整します comes from 調整する, “to adjust” or “fine-tune.” します is the polite nonpast form of する, so this can describe a present practice or a future action. The fixed translation identifies the omitted object as the milestones or goals already mentioned: the managers adjust them. Together, マネージャーが identifies the managers as the subject. 節目となる目標を設定し says that they set goals that serve as milestones, and その後 places the next action afterward. 状況がより明確になるにつれて gives the condition for that later adjustment, and 調整します states that they adjust the goals. The whole utterance therefore means: “Managers set milestones, then adjust them as context becomes clearer.”

  7. フィードバックが早い段階で届くのであれば、現実的だと思います。

    That sounds practical, as long as feedback arrives early.

    フィードバック
    feedback
    早い
    early
    段階
    stage
    届く
    arrive
    のであれば
    if; as long as
    現実的
    practical
    と思います
    I think
    More detail

    フィードバック means “feedback” here. It is a noun, so it can be followed by particles such as が when it is the subject of an event: フィードバックが届く = “feedback arrives.” 早い means “early” in this sentence. It is an i-adjective; before a noun, its attributive form is also 早い, as in 早い段階 (“an early stage”). Its opposite is 遅い (“late” or “slow”), depending on context. 段階 means “stage” or “phase.” The combination 早い段階 means “an early stage,” and で marks that stage as the time or point at which something happens. Thus, 早い段階で means “at an early stage” or “early on.” 届く means “arrive,” “reach,” or “be delivered” when something reaches its destination or recipient. It is an intransitive verb: フィードバックが届く uses が for the thing that arrives. Its polite form is 届きます; its negative form is 届かない. のであれば presents the preceding situation as a condition: “if it is the case that …” or, in this context, “as long as ….” Here it follows the clause フィードバックが早い段階で届く (“feedback arrives early”), producing フィードバックが早い段階で届くのであれば (“as long as feedback arrives early”). のであれば is more formal and explicit than a simple conditional such as なら in many contexts. 現実的 means “practical” or “realistic.” It is a na-adjective. Before a noun, it normally takes な, as in the example 現実的な計画 (“a practical plan”). In this sentence, 現実的だ makes the evaluation “is practical.” と思います literally presents the following evaluation as what the speaker thinks: と marks the quoted thought, and 思います is the polite form of 思う (“to think”). With an adjective or clause before it, the pattern …と思います commonly means “I think …” or “That seems …” in a polite, less forceful way. Example: この方法は現実的だと思います。 — “I think this method is practical.” Putting the parts together, フィードバックが早い段階で届く says that feedback arrives early, and のであれば makes that situation the condition. 現実的だと思います gives the speaker’s polite assessment: “I think it is practical.” The whole utterance therefore means: “That sounds practical, as long as feedback arrives early.”

  8. 早い段階でのフィードバックは期待されており、正式な評価のときだけに限られるものではありません。

    Early feedback is expected, not reserved for formal reviews.

    早い
    early
    段階
    stage
    フィードバック
    feedback
    期待されており
    is expected, and…
    正式
    formal
    評価
    evaluation; review
    とき
    time; occasion
    だけに限られるものではありません
    is not limited only to
    More detail

    早い means “early” here and is an い-adjective. Its attributive form is also 早い, so it directly modifies 段階: 早い段階 = “an early stage.” For comparison, 早く is the adverbial form, as in 早く来る (“come early”). 段階 is a noun meaning “stage” or “phase.” In 早い段階で, で marks the stage at which something applies or happens: “at an early stage.” The の in 段階でのフィードバック links that setting to the noun that follows, giving “feedback at an early stage.” フィードバック is a noun meaning “feedback.” It is a loanword used for comments or information given in response to work or progress. In this sentence it is the topic marked by は, so the sentence discusses early feedback. 期待されており comes from 期待する (“expect”) through the passive form 期待される (“be expected”), followed by ており. The passive is appropriate because the feedback is the thing that people expect; the person doing the expecting is not stated. 〜ており is a somewhat formal written connective related to 〜ていて, meaning “and is…” or “being…”. Thus フィードバックは期待されており says that feedback is expected and connects to the contrast that follows. 正式 means “formal” or “official.” It is a な-adjective, so before a noun it takes な: 正式な評価 means “a formal evaluation/review.” The な belongs to 正式; 評価 is the noun it describes. 評価 is a noun meaning “evaluation,” “assessment,” or, in this context, “review.” It can describe judging work or progress. For example, 評価を受ける means “receive an evaluation.” とき is a noun meaning “time” or “occasion.” In 正式な評価のとき, the preceding の connects 正式な評価 to とき, producing “at the time of a formal review.” だけに限られるものではありません uses the reusable pattern Nだけに限られる (“be limited only to N”) with ものではありません to deny that proposition. だけ marks the exclusive scope, while に限られる means “be restricted to.” The whole expression therefore means “is not limited only to.” Here, N is 正式な評価のとき, so the sentence says that the expected feedback is not reserved for formal reviews. Putting the parts together: 早い段階でのフィードバック is “feedback at an early stage”; は期待されており says that this feedback is expected; and 正式な評価のときだけに限られるものではありません says that it is not restricted to formal review occasions. The complete meaning is: “Early feedback is expected, not reserved for formal reviews.”

Grammar Points

~は~で考慮されます

業績と成果は正式な評価で考慮されます。

gyoh-SEH-kee toh seh-KOH wah say-SHEE-kee nah hyoh-KAH deh koh-RYOH sah-reh-MAHS

Performance and outcomes are considered in the formal review.

考慮されます is passive: the subject receives the action. で shows the context or process where it happens.

~たばかりの人

入社したばかりの人

nyoo-SHAH shee-TAH bah-kah-REE noh HEE-toh

someone who has just started at the company

たばかり means an action happened recently. It directly modifies a noun, as in 入社したばかりの人.

Japanese Vocabulary

バランス noun
bah-RAHN-soo balance

そのバランスは重要です。

意思決定 noun
EE-shee keh-tsu-TEH decision-making

意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合、速さだけを評価することは避けています。

協力して働く力 phrase
kyoh-RYOH-koo shee-TEH hah-RAH-koo chee-KAR-ah ability to collaborate

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

業績 noun
gyoh-SEH-kee performance

ここで業績がどのように評価されるのか理解したいです。

誤解を招く phrase
goh-KAI oh mah-NEH-koo to be misleading

成果だけでは、誤解を招くことがあるからです。

考慮されます verb
koh-RYOH sah-reh-MAHS are considered

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

重要です adj
joo-YOH dess is important; matters

そのバランスは重要です。

成果 noun
seh-KOH outcome; result

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

速さ noun
hah-yah-SAH speed

意思決定が後になって問題を生む場合、速さだけを評価することは避けています。

判断の質 phrase
han-DAN noh shee-tsuh quality of judgment

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

避けています verb
sah-keh-TEH ee-MAHS try to avoid; are avoiding

速さだけを評価することは避けています。

評価 noun
hyoh-KAH evaluation; review

評価では、成果、協力して働く力、そして判断の質が考慮されます。

Quiz

Spelling

Tap the letters to spell the word.

to be misleading

Show Answer誤解を招く

quality of judgment

Show Answer判断の質

ability to collaborate

Show Answer協力して働く力

balance

Show Answerバランス