Clarifying Vague Feedback | Learn Korean in English

Korean lesson set in a contemporary Seoul everyday setting: At work, two colleagues discuss how to ask for clearer feedback on a proposal revision without sounding defensive..

EN → KO / Level: B1

10 minutes free every day

Continue audio lessons in the app

Word explanations appear automatically in sync with the audio.

No login required · synced translations · playback with the screen locked

Choose your learning language and open this lesson in the app.

Kotobridge app audio lesson and word notes

About This Lesson

Use Clarifying Vague Feedback to practice Korean conversation, pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and quizzes.

Dialogue

A

피드백에는 제안서를 더 강화해야 한다고 되어 있는데, 너무 모호하게 느껴져요.

PEE-duh-baek-eh-neun jeh-AHN-suh-reul duh gahng-HWA-hae-ya han-da-go dweh-in-neun-deh, nuh-MOO mo-HO-ha-geh neu-kkyuh-juh-yo. The feedback says the proposal should be stronger, but that feels vague.
B

어느 부분을 수정해야 하는지 물어보세요. 근거인지, 어조인지, 아니면 구성인지요.

UH-neu boo-BOON-eul soo-JUNG-hae-ya ha-neun-ji moo-ruh-boh-SEH-yo. GEUN-guh-in-ji, uh-JO-in-ji, ah-nee-MYUN goo-SUNG-in-ji-yo. Ask which part needs revision: the evidence, tone, or structure.
A

서론이 문제를 충분히 명확하게 설명하지 못하는 것 같아요.

suh-RO-nee moon-JEH-reul choong-BOON-hee myung-HWA-ka-ge sul-myung-ha-ji mo-TA-neun gut-KKA-ta-yo. I think the introduction may not explain the problem clearly enough.
B

그렇다면 상대가 무엇을 바꾸기를 원하는지 구체적인 예를 물어보세요.

GEU-reo-ta-myun sang-DAE-ga moo-UH-seul ba-KKU-gi-reul WON-ha-neun-ji goo-CHEH-juh-gin YEH-reul moo-ruh-boh-SEH-yo. Then ask for a specific example of what they want changed.
A

그러면 방어적으로 들릴까요?

GEU-reo-myun bang-UH-juh-guh-ro deul-LIL-KKA-yo? Would that sound defensive?
B

상대의 기대에 맞추고 싶다고 말하면 방어적으로 들리지 않을 거예요.

sang-DAE-e gi-DAE-e mat-CHU-go SHIP-tta-go mal-ha-myun bang-UH-juh-guh-ro deul-LI-ji a-NEUL guh-YEH-yo. Not if you say you want to match their expectations.
A

더 많은 데이터를 원하는지, 아니면 더 자신감 있는 어조를 원하는지 물어볼 수 있어요.

duh MA-neun day-EE-tuh-reul WON-ha-neun-ji, ah-nee-MYUN duh ja-shin-GAHM in-neun uh-JO-reul WON-ha-neun-ji moo-ruh-BOL soo i-SUH-yo. I can ask whether they want more data or a more confident tone.
B

그러면 상대가 선택할 수 있는 두 가지 명확한 방향을 제시하는 셈이에요.

GEU-reo-myun sang-DAE-ga seon-TAEK-hal soo in-neun doo GA-ji myung-HWA-kan bang-HYANG-eul jeh-SHI-ha-neun SEM-ee-eh-yo. That gives them two clear directions to choose from.
A

방향을 알게 되면 제안서를 빠르게 수정할 수 있어요.

bang-HYANG-eul AL-kkeh dweh-MYUN jeh-AHN-suh-reul PPA-reu-geh soo-JUNG-hal soo i-SUH-yo. Once I know the direction, I can revise it quickly.
B

명확한 지침이 있으면 불필요하게 다시 쓰는 일을 줄일 수 있어요.

myung-HWA-kan ji-CHIM-ee i-SSEU-myun bool-PEE-ryo-ha-geh da-SHI SSEU-neun ee-reul JOO-ril ssu i-SUH-yo. Clear guidance can save unnecessary rewriting.

Sentence explanations

  1. 피드백에는 제안서를 더 강화해야 한다고 되어 있는데, 너무 모호하게 느껴져요.

    The feedback says the proposal should be stronger, but that feels vague.

    피드백
    feedback
    제안서를
    proposal
    더
    more
    강화해야
    should strengthen
    한다고 되어 있는데
    is stated that …, but …
    너무
    too
    모호하게
    vaguely
    느껴져요
    feels
    More detail

    피드백 is a noun meaning “feedback.” It is a loanword used for comments or evaluation given about something. Example: 피드백을 주세요. — “Please give me feedback.” 제안서를 means “the proposal” as the object of the following action. The base noun is 제안서 (“proposal”), and 를 marks it as the object. The object marker is attached here because the proposal is what someone is expected to strengthen. 더 means “more” and increases the degree of 강화하다 (“to strengthen”). Example: 설명을 더 명확하게 해 주세요. — “Please make the explanation clearer.” 강화해야 comes from 강화하다 (“to strengthen”). The form -해야 is part of -아/어야 하다, a construction expressing necessity or an expected action: 강화해야 하다 means “to have to/should strengthen.” In this sentence, it is the strengthening of the proposal that is presented as necessary. This is not the passive form; Korean presents the action as someone strengthening the proposal, while the translation conveys the resulting expectation that the proposal should be stronger. 한다고 되어 있는데 reports what is written or stated and then sets up a contrast. Here, 한다고 quotes the preceding necessity clause (강화해야 한다), 되어 있다 literally has the information “set/recorded,” and -는데 connects it to the speaker’s contrasting reaction. The combined pattern …다고 되어 있는데, … is reusable for “it says/states that …, but ….” Example: 안내문에 여기서 기다려야 한다고 되어 있는데, 자리가 없어요. — “The notice says we have to wait here, but there are no seats.” 너무 indicates an excessive degree: “too” or, in some contexts, emphatically “very.” Here it modifies 모호하게, so the intended meaning is “too vaguely” or “too unclearly,” not an independent statement about quantity. 모호하게 is the adverbial form of 모호하다, “to be vague/ambiguous.” The ending -게 makes a descriptive word modify an action or state: 모호하다 describes something as vague, while 모호하게 describes something as being perceived or expressed vaguely. Example: 설명이 모호해요. — “The explanation is vague.” 느껴져요 means “feels” or “seems” here. Its base form is 느껴지다, used when something is perceived as having a certain quality; -어요 gives a polite present-style ending. This differs from 느끼다, “to feel,” which more directly presents a person as experiencing a feeling. Example: 이 설명은 어렵게 느껴져요. — “This explanation feels difficult.” Together, 피드백에는 (in the feedback), 제안서를 더 강화해야 한다고 되어 있는데 (it says that the proposal should be strengthened), and 너무 모호하게 느껴져요 (it feels too vague) produce: “The feedback says the proposal should be stronger, but that feels vague.” The sentence reports the feedback’s recommendation without specifying what aspect of the proposal needs strengthening; the following context gives examples of such aspects as evidence, tone, or structure.

  2. 어느 부분을 수정해야 하는지 물어보세요. 근거인지, 어조인지, 아니면 구성인지요.

    Ask which part needs revision: the evidence, tone, or structure.

    어느 부분
    which part
    수정해야 하는지
    needs to be revised
    물어보세요
    please ask
    근거인지
    whether it is evidence
    어조인지
    whether it is tone
    아니면
    or
    구성인지요
    is it structure?
    More detail

    어느 부분 means “which part.” 어느 selects an item from alternatives, and 부분 means “part.” The reusable pattern 어느 + noun means “which + noun”; for example, 어느 책을 읽을까요? means “Which book shall I read?” 수정해야 하는지 means “needs to be revised” in this sentence. 수정하다 means “to revise” or “to correct.” In 수정해야 하다, -아/어야 하다 expresses necessity, so it conveys “need to revise” or “must revise.” The ending -는지 makes the clause an indirect question. Together with the preceding 어느 부분을, 어느 부분을 수정해야 하는지 means “which part needs to be revised.” 물어보세요 is a polite request or instruction based on 물어보다, “to ask” or “to inquire.” The ending -세요 gives the request a courteous form. Thus 물어보세요 means “please ask.” 근거인지 means “whether it is evidence.” 근거 means “evidence” or “basis.” After a noun, 이다 (“to be”) combines with -ㄴ지 as 인지, marking an indirect question: 근거인지 is structurally “whether [it] is evidence.” 어조인지 uses the same noun-plus-인지 pattern. 어조 means “tone,” so this phrase means “whether it is tone.” The repeated form makes this alternative parallel with 근거인지. 아니면 means “or” and introduces an alternative. For example, 오늘 아니면 내일 means “today or tomorrow.” 구성인지요 means “is it structure?” 구성 means “structure” or “composition.” Here 인지요 combines the noun-copula form 인지 with polite 요, giving a polite question-like ending. It closes the alternatives rather than continuing the earlier embedded question. Together, 어느 부분을 수정해야 하는지 물어보세요 means “Please ask which part needs revision.” The following alternatives identify the possible aspects: 근거인지, 어조인지, 아니면 구성인지요 means “whether it is the evidence, the tone, or the structure.” The complete utterance asks someone to identify which of those aspects requires revision.

  3. 서론이 문제를 충분히 명확하게 설명하지 못하는 것 같아요.

    I think the introduction may not explain the problem clearly enough.

    서론
    introduction
    문제
    problem
    충분히
    enough; sufficiently
    명확하게
    clearly
    설명하지 못하는
    not able to explain
    것 같아요
    seems; I think
    More detail

    서론 means “introduction” here, specifically the introductory section being evaluated. It is a noun; a useful contrast is 결론 (“conclusion”). Example: 서론이 짧아요. — “The introduction is short.” 문제 means “problem” here. It is a noun and can also refer to a question or exercise when the context supports that meaning. Example: 문제를 설명해 주세요. — “Please explain the problem.” 충분히 means “sufficiently” or “enough.” It modifies what follows, so here it says that the explanation does not reach a sufficient degree of clarity. The related adjective is 충분하다, “to be sufficient,” but the observed form is the adverb 충분히. 명확하게 means “clearly.” It is the adverbial form of 명확하다 (“to be clear”): 명확하다 → 명확하게. It describes the manner or quality of explaining. Example: 조건을 명확하게 설명했어요. — “I explained the conditions clearly.” 설명하지 못하는 combines 설명하다 (“to explain”) with -지 못하다, which expresses inability or failure to carry out the action. The ending -는 makes the resulting clause modify the following noun 것; thus, the clause describes something that is not able to explain. The observed form is not simply a general negation: 설명하지 않다 would mean “not explain,” while 설명하지 못하다 presents the result as inability or failure. Example: 이 자료는 내용을 설명하지 못해요. — “This material cannot explain the content.” 것 같아요 is a polite expression meaning “seems” or, with a speaker’s judgment, “I think.” Here the preceding clause is treated as something that seems to be the case, which softens the assessment rather than stating it as an absolute fact. 같아요 is the polite form used in this expression; the literal noun 것 is part of the construction, not a concrete object in this sentence. Example: 오늘은 비가 올 것 같아요. — “I think it will rain today.” Together, 서론이 marks “the introduction” as the subject, and 문제를 marks “the problem” as what is explained. 충분히 명확하게 means “clearly enough,” while 설명하지 못하는 says that the introduction fails to explain it adequately. The final 것 같아요 frames the whole assessment as the speaker’s impression: “I think the introduction may not explain the problem clearly enough.”

  4. 그렇다면 상대가 무엇을 바꾸기를 원하는지 구체적인 예를 물어보세요.

    Then ask for a specific example of what they want changed.

    그렇다면
    then; in that case
    상대가
    the other person; the counterpart
    무엇을
    what (as the object)
    바꾸기를
    changing; to change (as an object)
    원하는지
    whether someone wants to
    구체적인
    specific; concrete
    예를
    an example (as the object)
    물어보세요
    please ask
    More detail

    그렇다면 means “then” or “in that case.” 그렇다 means “to be so/be that way,” and -다면 presents a condition or assumption: 그렇다면 = “if that is so.” Here it links the request to the situation just described. 상대가 marks 상대 (“the other person” or “the other party”) as the subject with 가. The translation identifies this subject as “they,” but it does not specify a particular person. 상대 is useful when referring to the person on the other side of an interaction. 무엇을 means “what” as the object of an action. 무엇 is the question word “what,” and 을 marks it as the object. For example, 무엇을 찾으세요? means “What are you looking for?” 바꾸기를 expresses “changing” or “to change” as the object of 원하다 (“to want”). It is formed from 바꾸다 (“to change”) + -기 (which turns the verb into an activity or proposition) + 를 (object marking). The form 바꾸다 is the dictionary form; 바꿔요 is a common polite present form. In this sentence, the thing to be changed is left open and is supplied by 무엇을. 원하는지 comes from 원하다 (“to want”) plus -는지, which marks an embedded question or uncertainty. The pattern V-기를 원하다 means “want to V,” while 무엇을 V-기를 원하는지 means “what someone wants to V.” Here, 상대가 무엇을 바꾸기를 원하는지 is the embedded question “what they want to change.” 구체적인 means “specific” or “concrete.” Its base form is 구체적이다; before a noun, the descriptive form is 구체적인, as in 구체적인 계획 (“a specific plan”). It modifies 예, rather than expressing the act of asking itself. 예를 means “an example” as the object of the following verb. The noun is 예, and 를 marks it as the object. 예를 들어 주세요 means “Please give an example,” a useful related pattern in which 예 is again the object. 물어보세요 means “please ask.” The dictionary form is 물어보다, a verb meaning “to ask” or “to inquire”; the polite request ending -세요 gives 물어보세요. In this sentence, the request is to ask for an example, not to give one. Together, 상대가 무엇을 바꾸기를 원하는지 means “what the other person wants to change,” and 구체적인 예를 물어보세요 means “ask for a specific example.” With 그렇다면 connecting this advice to the preceding situation, the whole utterance means: “Then ask for a specific example of what they want changed.”

  5. 그러면 방어적으로 들릴까요?

    Would that sound defensive?

    그러면
    then / in that case
    방어적으로
    defensively
    들릴까요?
    would it sound?
    More detail

    그러면 means “then” or “in that case.” It connects the question to a condition or suggestion just mentioned. A reusable pattern is 그러면 + sentence: “Then/in that case, …” 방어적으로 means “defensively” here. It is the adverbial form of 방어적이다, “to be defensive.” The ending -적으로 commonly turns a descriptive word into an adverb describing how something is done or perceived. Example: 그는 방어적으로 대답했어요. — “He answered defensively.” 들릴까요? comes from 들리다, which can mean “to be heard” and, as in this sentence, “to sound” or “come across.” Here it asks about the impression the wording may give, not whether someone physically hears it. 들리다 becomes 들릴까요?: the stem 들리- combines with -ㄹ까요?, a polite question about a possible or expected result. Example: 이 표현이 자연스럽게 들릴까요? — “Would this expression sound natural?” Together, 방어적으로 들릴까요? asks whether something will come across as defensive. With 그러면, the complete utterance means: “Then/in that case, would that sound defensive?” The question leaves the thing being evaluated understood from the surrounding discussion rather than naming it again. -ㄹ까요? makes this a polite request for an assessment of a possible impression.

  6. 상대의 기대에 맞추고 싶다고 말하면 방어적으로 들리지 않을 거예요.

    Not if you say you want to match their expectations.

    상대
    other person; other party
    기대
    expectations
    맞추고 싶다
    want to match
    말하면
    if you say
    방어적으로
    defensively
    들리지 않을 거예요
    will not sound
    More detail

    상대 means the other person or party involved in the situation. Its possessive form 상대의 in the sentence means “the other party’s”; 의 marks possession or association. The exact referent is not specified further here. 기대 means “expectation(s).” In 상대의 기대, it is the noun possessed by the other party. A useful pattern is N의 N, meaning “N’s N” or “the N of N.” 맞추고 싶다 means “want to match” or “want to adjust to.” The verb is 맞추다, “to match, fit, or adjust,” and -고 싶다 expresses the subject’s desire to do the preceding action. Here, 맞추고 싶다 is followed by -고 in 맞추고 싶다고, which packages the desire as the content of what is said: “that [someone] wants to match.” 말하면 comes from 말하다, “to say,” with -(으)면, a conditional ending. In this sentence, the understood subject is “you,” so 말하면 means “if you say.” The combination 맞추고 싶다고 말하면 means “if you say that you want to match [them/their expectations].” 방어적으로 means “defensively.” It is the adverbial form of 방어적이다, “to be defensive,” and describes how something is perceived. The ending -적으로 commonly turns an adjective-like form into an adverb, as in “in a defensive manner.” 들리지 않을 거예요 means “will not sound” in this context. 들리다 can mean “be heard,” but here it means “sound or come across” to a listener. -지 않다 negates the verb, and -(으)ㄹ 거예요 presents a likely or intended future result in polite speech: 들릴 거예요 would mean “will sound,” while 들리지 않을 거예요 means “will not sound.” Together, 상대의 기대에 맞추고 싶다고 말하면 means “if you say that you want to match the other party’s expectations.” The particle 에 marks what the action is directed toward in 기대에 맞추다, a reusable pattern meaning “match or adjust to expectations.” The rest, 방어적으로 들리지 않을 거예요, says that this will not sound defensive. Thus the whole utterance means: “Not if you say you want to match their expectations.”

  7. 더 많은 데이터를 원하는지, 아니면 더 자신감 있는 어조를 원하는지 물어볼 수 있어요.

    I can ask whether they want more data or a more confident tone.

    더 많은
    more
    데이터
    data
    원하는지
    whether someone wants
    아니면
    or else
    더 자신감 있는
    more confident
    어조
    tone
    물어볼 수 있어요
    can ask
    More detail

    더 많은 combines 더 (“more”) with 많다 (“to be many/much”). 많은 is the form of 많다 used before a noun, so 더 많은 데이터 means “more data.” Here 더 marks a greater amount; it does not itself specify an exact quantity. 데이터 is the noun “data.” It is a loanword used as a regular Korean noun. In this sentence it is the thing that may be wanted. 원하는지 comes from 원하다 (“to want”) plus -는지, which embeds an open yes-or-no question: 원하는지 = “whether [someone] wants.” The subject is not stated in this form; the fixed translation identifies that person as “they.” Compare 원하는지 물어보다 (“ask whether [someone] wants it”) with 원하는 것을 말하다 (“say what [someone] wants”), where -는지 marks the embedded question rather than a noun-like object. 아니면 introduces the alternative in a choice: “or.” It links the two possibilities inside the embedded question. Thus 더 많은 데이터를 원하는지, 아니면 더 자신감 있는 어조를 원하는지 asks whether the preference is the first option or the second option. 더 자신감 있는 means “more confident.” 자신감 있는 is the attributive form of the expression 자신감 있다, literally “have confidence,” and 더 makes it comparative. 있는 modifies the following noun 어조; it is not the form of 어조. A useful pattern is 더 + adjective-like expression + noun, as in 더 자연스러운 표현 (“a more natural expression”). 어조 means “tone,” especially the tone or manner conveyed by wording or speech. Here it is the second thing that may be wanted: a more confident tone. 물어볼 수 있어요 expresses ability or possibility: “can ask.” The verb 물어보다 is commonly used for “to ask,” and in the construction -ㄹ 수 있다 it appears as 물어볼 수 있다; the polite present ending gives 물어볼 수 있어요. The pattern 동사-(으)ㄹ 수 있어요 means “can do” or “it is possible to do,” for example, 다시 물어볼 수 있어요 = “I can ask again.” As a whole, 더 많은 데이터를 원하는지, 아니면 더 자신감 있는 어조를 원하는지 presents two alternative preferences as the content of the question. The omitted subject of 물어볼 수 있어요 is understood from the fixed translation as “I,” so the complete meaning is “I can ask whether they want more data or a more confident tone.”

  8. 그러면 상대가 선택할 수 있는 두 가지 명확한 방향을 제시하는 셈이에요.

    That gives them two clear directions to choose from.

    그러면
    then; in that case
    상대
    the other party
    선택할
    to choose
    수 있는
    being able to
    두 가지
    two options
    명확한
    clear
    방향
    direction
    제시하는
    presenting; offering
    셈이에요
    it amounts to
    More detail

    그러면 means “then” or “in that case.” It links this statement to what was just mentioned. Example: 그러면 시작해요 — “Then, let’s start.” 상대 means “the other party” or “counterpart” in an interaction. Here, the translation identifies it as the party who will choose. It is a noun, not a pronoun, so it does not itself specify a person’s gender or number. 선택할 comes from 선택하다, “to choose.” The ending -ㄹ is the attributive form used in 선택할 수 있다, the pattern for expressing ability or possibility. In this sentence, 상대가 is the subject of 선택하다: the other party is the one who can choose. 수 있는 belongs with the preceding 선택할 in the pattern V-(으)ㄹ 수 있다, “can V” or “be able to V.” 있는 is the attributive form of 있다; it does not agree with 방향 or change to match that noun. Together, 선택할 수 있는 modifies 두 가지 ... 방향 and means “that the other party can choose from.” 두 가지 means “two options” here. 두 is the native Korean numeral “two,” and 가지 is a classifier/noun used for kinds or options. The explicit 두 gives this phrase a count of two; 가지 alone would not. 명확한 is the attributive form of the adjective 명확하다, “to be clear.” It modifies 방향, so 명확한 방향 means “a clear direction.” 방향 means “direction.” In this sentence it refers to an available course or option, as shown by the surrounding phrase. Example: 새로운 방향을 찾다 — “to find a new direction.” 제시하는 comes from 제시하다, “to present” or “to offer.” Its -는 attributive form modifies 셈 in the construction 제시하는 셈이에요; it describes the action that the situation effectively amounts to. 제시하다 emphasizes putting an option or proposal forward. 셈이에요 is the polite form used in the construction V-는 셈이다. This construction says that something effectively amounts to, or counts as, the preceding action. Thus 제시하는 셈이에요 means “it amounts to presenting [them]”; 셈 is not being used here to describe a literal calculation. Together, 상대가 선택할 수 있는 두 가지 명확한 방향 means “two clear directions that the other party can choose from.” 제시하는 셈이에요 presents the action as effectively offering those directions. With 그러면, the whole utterance means: “Then, that amounts to presenting them with two clear directions to choose from.”

  9. 방향을 알게 되면 제안서를 빠르게 수정할 수 있어요.

    Once I know the direction, I can revise it quickly.

    방향
    direction
    알게 되면
    once [I] know
    제안서
    proposal
    빠르게
    quickly
    수정할
    revise
    수 있어요
    can
    More detail

    방향 means “direction” here, and it is a noun. It can refer to a course, approach, or intended direction depending on context. In the preceding context, the related phrase 두 가지 ... 방향 shows the same noun used for alternative directions. 알게 되면 means “once I know.” The base verb is 알다 (“to know”). -게 되다 presents coming to know or ending up knowing, while -면 makes the condition “if/when.” Together, 알게 되면 means “once I know” in this sentence. The understood subject is “I,” as specified by the translation. Example: 답을 알게 되면 알려 주세요. — “Once you find out the answer, please let me know.” 제안서 means “proposal,” specifically a proposal document. In 제안서를, the particle -를 marks it as the object of the later action. The fixed translation identifies this proposal as what will be revised; the Korean sentence leaves the pronoun unstated rather than using a separate word for “it.” 빠르게 means “quickly.” It is the adverbial form of 빠르다 (“to be fast”) and describes the speed of the revision. The related contrast is 느리게, “slowly.” Example: 문서를 빠르게 확인했어요. — “I checked the document quickly.” 수정할 comes from the verb 수정하다, “to revise” or “to edit.” The ending -할 is the attributive form used before 수 in the construction 수정할 수 있어요; it does not mean that the revision is merely planned. Here, 수정하다 takes 제안서를 as its object. 수 있어요 is the ability or possibility construction V-(으)ㄹ 수 있다, meaning “can” or “be able to.” After the preceding 수정할, it gives 수정할 수 있어요, “can revise.” 있어요 is the polite present form of 있다 in this construction. Example: 오늘 고칠 수 있어요. — “I can fix it today.” The sentence builds as 방향을 알게 되면 (“once I know the direction”) + 제안서를 빠르게 수정할 수 있어요 (“I can revise the proposal quickly”). Thus the whole utterance means: “Once I know the direction, I can revise it quickly.”

  10. 명확한 지침이 있으면 불필요하게 다시 쓰는 일을 줄일 수 있어요.

    Clear guidance can save unnecessary rewriting.

    명확한
    clear
    지침
    guidance; instructions
    있으면
    if there is; when present
    불필요하게
    unnecessarily
    다시 쓰는
    rewriting; writing again
    일
    task; act
    줄일 수 있어요
    can reduce
    More detail

    명확한 comes from 명확하다, meaning “to be clear.” The ending -ㄴ makes this descriptive word modify a following noun: 명확한 지침 = “clear guidance.” This form is used here because the word describes 지침, not because 지침 itself carries the adjective’s form. 지침 is a noun meaning “guidance” or “instructions.” In this sentence, it is the thing whose presence is presented as a condition. Example: 명확한 지침이 필요해요. = “Clear guidance is necessary.” 있으면 is 있다 (“to exist; to be present”) plus the conditional ending -으면, giving “if there is” or “when there is.” With 지침이, it means “if clear guidance is available/present.” The -으면/-면 pattern forms a condition; the choice of ending depends on the preceding form. 불필요하게 is the adverb formed from 불필요하다 (“to be unnecessary”) with -게. It describes the manner or status of the rewriting: “unnecessarily.” The adverb modifies the following rewriting expression, rather than the guidance. 다시 쓰는 is based on 다시 쓰다, “to write again” or “to rewrite.” 다시 means “again,” and 쓰다 is the lexical verb “to write” in this context. The -는 form makes the verb phrase modify a noun: 다시 쓰는 일 means “the act of rewriting.” Example: 문서를 다시 써요. = “I rewrite the document.” 일 is a noun meaning “thing,” “task,” or “act.” Here it nominalizes the activity described by 다시 쓰는, so 다시 쓰는 일 is literally the “act/task of writing again,” naturally “rewriting.” It does not by itself specify who performs the action. 줄일 수 있어요 is based on 줄이다, “to reduce,” followed by -(으)ㄹ 수 있다, “can; be able to,” and the polite ending -어요. Thus it expresses that reducing something is possible: “can reduce.” Example: 시간을 줄일 수 있어요. = “We can reduce the time.” The subject and the exact agent are not stated in this sentence. Together, 명확한 지침이 있으면 sets the condition “if there is clear guidance,” while 불필요하게 다시 쓰는 일을 identifies “the task of rewriting unnecessarily” as what can be reduced. 줄일 수 있어요 says that this reduction is possible. The whole utterance therefore means: “Clear guidance can reduce unnecessary rewriting,” matching the fixed translation. This is a polite, reusable way to express a condition followed by a possible result.

Grammar Points

동사 어간 + -아/어야 하다

제안서를 수정해야 해요.

jeh-AHN-suh-reul soo-JUNG-hae-ya hae-yo.

You need to revise the proposal.

-아/어야 하다 expresses necessity or obligation. The form changes according to the verb stem.

형용사 어간 + -게

명확하게 설명하다

myung-HWA-ka-ge sul-myung-ha-da

to explain clearly

-게 changes an adjective into an adverb, describing how an action is performed.

Korean Vocabulary

강화하다 verb
gahng-HWA-ha-da to strengthen 강화해야
구성 noun
goo-SUNG structure
근거 noun
GEUN-guh evidence
모호하다 adj
mo-HO-ha-da to be vague 모호하게
문제 noun
moon-JEH problem
부분 noun
boo-BOON part
서론 noun
suh-RON introduction
수정하다 verb
soo-JUNG-ha-da to revise 수정해야
어조 noun
uh-JO tone
제안서 noun
jeh-AHN-suh proposal 제안서를
충분히 adv
choong-BOON-hee sufficiently
피드백 noun
PEE-duh-baek feedback

Quiz

Word Order

Arrange the words in the correct order.

Would that sound defensive?

Show Answer그러면 방어적으로 들릴까요?

Spelling

Tap the letters to spell the word.

to be vague

Show Answer모호하게

to revise

Show Answer수정해야

to strengthen

Show Answer강화해야

proposal

Show Answer제안서를