Improving office recycling practices | Learn French in English

French lesson set in a contemporary Paris everyday setting: At work, two adults discuss clearer recycling labels, visible sorting examples, and reducing disposable supplies through practical procurement changes..

EN → FR / Level: B2

10 minutes free every day

Continue audio lessons in the app

Word explanations appear automatically in sync with the audio.

No login required · synced translations · playback with the screen locked

Choose your learning language and open this lesson in the app.

Kotobridge app audio lesson and word notes

About This Lesson

Use Improving office recycling practices to practice French conversation, pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and quizzes.

Dialogue

A

Nous avons des bacs de recyclage au bureau, mais les gens semblent perplexes.

noo zah-VOHN day bahk duh ray-see-KLAHZH oh byoo-ROH, meh lay zhahn sahmbl pair-PLEHKS. We have recycling bins in the office, but people seem confused.
B

Les étiquettes sont probablement trop vagues pour un usage quotidien.

layz ay-tee-KET sohn proh-bah-bluh-MAHN troh vahg poor uhn oo-ZAHZH koh-tee-DYAN. The labels are probably too vague for daily use.
A

Il faudrait rendre les consignes de tri plus simples et plus visibles.

eel foh-DRAY RAHN-druh lay kohn-SEEN-yuh duh TREE ploo SANPL ay ploo vee-ZEE-bluh. We should make sorting rules simpler and more visible.
B

Des exemples visuels près des bacs réduiraient les erreurs.

dayz eg-ZAHNPL vee-ZWEL preh day bahk ray-dwee-RAY lay-ZEH-rur. Visual examples near the bins would reduce mistakes.
A

Je pense aussi qu'il faudrait commander moins de fournitures jetables.

zhuh PAHNS oh-SEE keel foh-DRAY koh-mahn-DAY mwan duh foor-nee-TEWR zheh-TAH-bluh. I also think fewer disposable supplies should be ordered.
B

Cela demande des changements dans les achats, pas seulement des rappels.

suh-LAH duh-MAHND day shahnzh-MAHN dahn lay-ZAH-shay, pah suhl-MAHN day rah-PEHL. That requires procurement changes, not just reminders.
A

Pourrions-nous commencer par les articles qui ont des solutions de remplacement faciles ?

poo-ree-OHN noo koh-mahn-SAY par lay zar-TEE-kl kee ohn day soh-loo-SYOHN duh rahm-plahs-MAHN fah-SEEL? Could we start with items that have easy alternatives?
B

Cela rendrait le changement moins perturbant.

suh-LAH rahn-DRAY luh shahnzh-MAHN mwan pair-tewr-BAHN. That would make the change less disruptive.

Sentence explanations

  1. Nous avons des bacs de recyclage au bureau, mais les gens semblent perplexes.

    We have recycling bins in the office, but people seem confused.

    Nous avons
    we have
    bacs
    bins
    recyclage
    recycling
    bureau
    office
    gens
    people
    semblent
    seem
    perplexes
    confused
    More detail

    Nous avons uses avoir (“to have”) in the present tense: avons is the first-person plural form, used with nous. The reusable pattern is nous avons + noun (“we have ...”). Example: Nous avons une question. — “We have a question.” bacs means bins or containers here. Its singular base form is bac; bacs is the plural form, marked in writing by -s. des bacs means “bins” without specifying a particular number; des is the plural indefinite article, not a precise count. recyclage is the noun “recycling.” In des bacs de recyclage, de links the container to its purpose or contents: “recycling bins.” The same pattern is reusable in phrases such as un sac de voyage — “a travel bag.” bureau means “office” here. Its singular form appears in au bureau: au is the contraction of à and le, giving the meaning “at/in the office.” The noun is masculine singular, which is why the definite article is le before contraction. Example: Je travaille au bureau. — “I work at the office.” gens means “people.” It is a plural noun and normally refers to people collectively rather than naming a particular individual. In this sentence it is the subject of the second clause. semblent is the present-tense third-person plural form of sembler, “to seem.” The subject is les gens, so the plural form semblent is used. A useful pattern is quelqu’un semble + adjective, meaning “someone seems ...”; with a plural subject, the verb changes to a plural form. Example: Ils semblent prêts. — “They seem ready.” perplexes is the plural form of the adjective perplexe, meaning “confused” or “puzzled” here. It describes les gens, and the final -s marks plural in writing. The construction sembler + adjective presents an appearance or impression: semblent perplexes means “seem confused,” rather than directly asserting that the people are confused. Together, Nous avons des bacs de recyclage au bureau means “We have recycling bins in the office.” Mais then introduces a contrast, and les gens semblent perplexes means “people seem confused.” The complete utterance is therefore: “We have recycling bins in the office, but people seem confused.”

  2. Les étiquettes sont probablement trop vagues pour un usage quotidien.

    The labels are probably too vague for daily use.

    étiquettes
    labels
    sont
    are
    probablement
    probably
    trop
    too
    vagues
    vague
    usage
    use
    quotidien
    daily
    More detail

    étiquettes means “labels” here. Its singular base form is étiquette; the plural adds -s: une étiquette → des étiquettes. French nouns have grammatical gender, and étiquette is feminine, but the plural form itself does not show gender. sont is the present-tense form of être (“to be”) for ils/elles and vous. Here it agrees with the plural subject Les étiquettes: Les étiquettes sont... Example: Les règles sont claires. — “The rules are clear.” probablement means “probably.” It is an adverb, so it does not change for number or gender. It expresses likelihood rather than certainty. trop means “too” before the adjective vagues. It marks an excessive degree: the labels are vague beyond what is useful for the stated purpose. This is different from très (“very”), which intensifies without itself saying that the degree is excessive. vagues means “vague” here. The base adjective is vague; its plural form is also vagues in writing, with -s added. Because it describes feminine plural étiquettes, it has feminine plural agreement. The feminine singular is vague, and the masculine singular is also vague; the plural spelling adds -s. Example: Les instructions sont vagues. — “The instructions are vague.” usage means “use” in the sense of practical application or use. It is a masculine noun: un usage. Do not confuse it with utilisation, another noun meaning “use” that is feminine: une utilisation. quotidien means “daily” here and describes usage. The adjective is masculine singular because usage is masculine singular: un usage quotidien. Its feminine singular is quotidienne, as in une activité quotidienne (“a daily activity”); its masculine plural is quotidiens. The remaining words connect the selected items into the full pattern: pour un usage quotidien means “for daily use.” pour introduces the purpose or context, and un is an indefinite article agreeing with masculine singular usage; it does not by itself assert a numerical count. The structure être trop + adjective + pour... means that something has an excessive quality for a particular purpose. Together, Les étiquettes sont probablement trop vagues pour un usage quotidien. means “The labels are probably too vague for daily use.” The subject is the labels, sont links that subject to the adjective, probablement makes the judgment tentative, and trop vagues says their lack of specificity exceeds what daily use requires.

  3. Il faudrait rendre les consignes de tri plus simples et plus visibles.

    We should make sorting rules simpler and more visible.

    Il faudrait
    we should
    rendre
    make
    consignes
    instructions; rules
    tri
    sorting
    plus simples
    simpler
    plus visibles
    more visible
    More detail

    Il faudrait is the impersonal conditional form of falloir. Here it expresses a recommendation: “we should” or, more literally, “it would be necessary.” It does not identify a grammatical subject doing the action; the proposed action is supplied by the infinitive that follows. Compare Il faut agir (“We/one must act”) with Il faudrait agir (“We/one should act” or “It would be advisable to act”). rendre means “to make” in the sense of causing something to become a certain way. It is an infinitive after Il faudrait. The reusable pattern is rendre + object + adjective: rendre le texte plus clair means “make the text clearer.” This is different from simply describing the object with être, as in Le texte est clair (“The text is clear”). les consignes means “the instructions” or “the guidelines” here. Consigne is a feminine noun; les marks the plural definite form, while the noun itself appears as consignes with plural -s. In this sentence, the instructions concern sorting, rather than a command to a specific individual. tri means “sorting.” It is a masculine noun, and de tri specifies the type or purpose of the consignes: “sorting instructions” or “instructions for sorting.” The pattern de + noun often links a general noun to the activity or category associated with it. plus simples means “simpler.” Simples is the plural form of the adjective simple; it has the same spelling for masculine and feminine plural. Plus + adjective forms a comparative, so plus simple means “simpler” or “more simple.” Here it agrees in number with consignes: des consignes plus simples. plus visibles means “more visible.” The base adjective is visible, and visibles is its plural form; the form is feminine plural here because it describes consignes. Plus visible means “more visible,” while the opposite comparison is moins visible (“less visible”). The adjective refers to how easy the instructions are to notice or see, not to their clarity; that is why it is stated separately from plus simples. Together, Il faudrait rendre les consignes de tri plus simples et plus visibles means “We should make the sorting instructions simpler and more visible.” The structure is Il faudrait + infinitive action rendre + object les consignes de tri + two coordinated results, plus simples and plus visibles. Both adjectives describe the same instructions, and et connects the two desired changes.

  4. Des exemples visuels près des bacs réduiraient les erreurs.

    Visual examples near the bins would reduce mistakes.

    exemples
    examples
    visuels
    visual
    près des
    near the
    bacs
    bins
    réduiraient
    would reduce
    erreurs
    mistakes
    More detail

    exemples means “examples” here. It is the plural of exemple; the singular is un exemple, and the plural article is des exemples. Example: Un exemple aide. — “An example helps.” visuels describes exemples. It is the masculine plural form of the adjective visuel (“visual”): visuel for masculine singular, visuelle for feminine singular, visuels for masculine plural, and visuelles for feminine plural. The ending agrees with exemples, which is masculine plural. Example: des supports visuels — “visual materials.” près des expresses location: “near the.” près de is followed by the thing located nearby; before plural les, de combines with les as des. Example: près de la porte — “near the door.” bacs means “bins” here. It is the plural of bac; the singular is un bac. French nouns ending in -s in the plural are often pronounced like their singular, so the written plural is important. Example: Les bacs sont dehors. — “The bins are outside.” réduiraient is the third-person plural conditional form of réduire (“to reduce”): ils/elles réduiraient — “they would reduce.” The conditional presents the reduction as dependent on a condition or proposal rather than as a definite present fact. Example: Ces changements réduiraient les coûts. — “These changes would reduce costs.” erreurs means “mistakes” here. It is the plural of the feminine noun erreur; the singular is une erreur, and the plural is des erreurs. Example: J’ai fait une erreur. — “I made a mistake.” Together, Des exemples visuels près des bacs means “visual examples near the bins,” and réduiraient les erreurs means “would reduce mistakes.” The complete utterance therefore says: “Visual examples near the bins would reduce mistakes.”

  5. Je pense aussi qu'il faudrait commander moins de fournitures jetables.

    I also think fewer disposable supplies should be ordered.

    Je pense
    I think
    aussi
    also
    il faudrait
    it would be necessary; should
    commander
    to order
    moins
    fewer; less
    fournitures
    supplies
    jetables
    disposable
    More detail

    Je pense means “I think” here. The verb is penser, “to think”; pense is its present-tense form with je. French commonly uses penser que before a statement: Je pense que c’est utile. — “I think it is useful.” In this sentence, que introduces the opinion that follows. aussi adds the meaning “also” or “too.” It modifies the speaker’s opinion: the speaker agrees with or adds to another point, without changing the main action. il faudrait is the impersonal conditional form of falloir. The fixed expression il faut means “it is necessary” or “one must”; il faudrait presents that need more tentatively as “it would be necessary” and commonly gives the practical meaning “should.” Falloir is used impersonally with il; it does not name a specific person who must act. For example, Il faudrait vérifier les chiffres. means “The figures should be checked.” commander is the infinitive “to order.” After il faudrait, the infinitive names the action that would be necessary: Il faudrait commander... — “We/one should order...” The French sentence does not grammatically specify who will place the order. moins means “less” or “fewer,” depending on the noun or amount being compared. It is invariable: it does not take a plural ending. With a countable plural noun, as here, it means “fewer”: moins de fournitures — “fewer supplies.” The pattern moins de + noun expresses a smaller quantity than a comparison point, which is understood from context. fournitures is the plural of the feminine noun fourniture, meaning “supply” or “supplies.” In this sentence it refers to supplies in general, not to one specifically identified item. The plural form is required because the phrase describes supplies as a group. For example, Nous avons acheté des fournitures. means “We bought supplies.” jetables is the plural form of the adjective jetable, meaning “disposable.” It agrees with fournitures in the plural; the feminine and masculine plural forms are both jetables in spelling. The adjective describes supplies intended to be thrown away after use. For example, des gants jetables means “disposable gloves.” Together, Je pense aussi que introduces an additional opinion, and il faudrait commander moins de fournitures jetables says that ordering a smaller quantity of disposable supplies would be advisable or necessary. The complete meaning is: “I also think fewer disposable supplies should be ordered.”

  6. Cela demande des changements dans les achats, pas seulement des rappels.

    That requires procurement changes, not just reminders.

    Cela
    That
    demande
    requires
    changements
    changes
    dans
    in
    achats
    procurement
    pas seulement
    not only
    rappels
    reminders
    More detail

    Cela is a neutral singular demonstrative pronoun meaning “that” here. It refers to the requirement or situation under discussion, rather than identifying a particular noun by grammatical gender. Related forms include ce before some masculine singular nouns and cette before feminine singular nouns, but cela stands independently as a pronoun. demande is the present-tense third-person singular form of demander. In this sentence, demander means “to require,” not “to ask someone for something”: “that requires.” The form agrees with the singular subject Cela. For example, Cette tâche demande du temps. means “This task requires time.” changements is the plural of the noun changement, “change.” The plural ending indicates more than one change; it does not itself specify how many. French commonly uses un changement for one change and des changements for changes in general or more than one change. dans is a preposition meaning “in” here. It introduces the area affected by the changes. The pattern des changements dans + area can be reused for changes in a process or domain. achats is the plural of achat, “purchase” or “procurement.” In this context, the plural and the surrounding meaning support “procurement” as an activity or area, rather than one particular purchase. dans les achats therefore means “in procurement” or “in purchasing.” pas seulement means “not only” or, in this contrast, “not just.” It limits the second part of the contrast: the requirement involves more than the reminders mentioned afterward. French often uses pas seulement X, mais aussi Y for “not only X, but also Y”; here the mais aussi part is understood from the contrast and is not stated. rappels is the plural of rappel, “reminder.” Here it refers to reminders as an intervention or measure, not to a single reminder. The plural form is useful in patterns such as des rappels réguliers (“regular reminders”). Together, Cela demande des changements dans les achats says “That requires procurement changes.” The contrast pas seulement des rappels adds “not just reminders,” so the complete utterance is: “That requires procurement changes, not just reminders.”

  7. Pourrions-nous commencer par les articles qui ont des solutions de remplacement faciles ?

    Could we start with items that have easy alternatives?

    Pourrions-nous
    Could we
    commencer par
    start with
    articles
    items
    ont
    have
    solutions
    solutions
    remplacement
    replacement
    faciles
    easy
    More detail

    Pourrions-nous means “could we?” here. It is the conditional present of pouvoir (“can/to be able to”) for nous: nous pouvons = “we can,” while nous pourrions = “we could.” French forms a question here by placing the verb before the subject pronoun: Pourrions-nous ... ? This presents the proposal politely without changing the participants. commencer par is the reusable infinitive pattern “to start with.” After a form such as pourrions-nous, the next verb remains in the infinitive: Pourrions-nous commencer... Example: Nous pouvons commencer par cette étape. — “We can start with this step.” articles is the plural noun “items” in the fixed translation and fits the procurement context. Its singular is article; the plural ending is written -s. In another context, article can refer to an article or product, so the intended “items” meaning comes from this sentence and its translation. ont is the present-tense third-person plural form of avoir (“to have”): ils/elles ont. It agrees with the plural subject supplied by qui, referring to the plural articles: the items “have” the stated feature. Example: Ces produits ont une alternative. — “These products have an alternative.” solutions means “solutions” and is the plural of solution. Here it is part of solutions de remplacement, meaning “replacement or alternative solutions.” The plural form matches the idea that the items have such solutions; the noun itself is not the adjective’s base form. remplacement is a noun meaning “replacement.” In solutions de remplacement, the preposition de links it to solutions, giving the compound meaning “replacement solutions” or, naturally here, “alternatives.” This is a noun phrase, not an inflected form of solutions. faciles means “easy” in this sentence. It is the plural form of the adjective facile; facile has the same form for masculine and feminine singular, while faciles marks plural agreement. It describes solutions, which is feminine plural: des solutions faciles — “easy solutions.” The relative word qui introduces the clause describing which articles are meant: qui ont des solutions de remplacement faciles = “that have easy alternatives.” The clause uses ont because its subject is plural. Together, Pourrions-nous commencer par (“Could we start with”), les articles (“the items”), and the relative clause identify the proposed starting group. The complete meaning is: “Could we start with items that have easy alternatives?”

  8. Cela rendrait le changement moins perturbant.

    That would make the change less disruptive.

    Cela
    That
    rendrait
    would make
    changement
    change
    moins
    less
    perturbant
    disruptive
    More detail

    Cela is an invariable demonstrative pronoun meaning “that” here. It points to a situation or idea, but the supplied sentence does not identify a more specific referent. Unlike a demonstrative adjective such as ce or cette, it stands on its own. rendrait is the third-person singular conditional form of rendre (“to make” in this construction). The useful pattern is rendre + object + adjective: “make something + adjective.” The conditional gives the meaning “would make,” presenting the result as dependent or hypothetical rather than as an established fact. For example: Cela rendrait le travail plus simple. — “That would make the work simpler.” changement is a masculine noun meaning “change.” In the sentence, le changement means “the change,” referring to the change under discussion. A useful contrast is un changement (“a change”) versus le changement (“the change”); the article marks definiteness, not a numeric count. moins means “less” when it reduces the degree of a following description. In moins perturbant, it forms a comparative of lower degree: “less disruptive.” It can also modify verbs or nouns in other contexts, but here it modifies the description of the change. perturbant is an adjective meaning “disruptive” here. It comes from the verb perturber (“to disrupt”), but in this sentence it describes the effect of the change rather than functioning as a finite verb. Its form agrees with the noun it describes: le changement is masculine singular, so perturbant has the masculine singular form. The adjective can also appear in other forms, such as perturbante with a feminine singular noun. Together, rendre le changement moins perturbant means “make the change less disruptive”: the change remains the object being affected, and moins perturbant describes its reduced disruptive effect. With Cela as the subject and rendrait in the conditional, the complete utterance means “That would make the change less disruptive.”

Grammar Points

Le conditionnel présent : réduiraient

Des exemples visuels réduiraient les erreurs.

dayz eg-ZAHNPL vee-ZWEL ray-dwee-RAY lay-ZEH-rur.

Visual examples would reduce mistakes.

The conditional expresses a possible or hypothetical result. The ending -aient marks the third-person plural here.

commencer par + nom

Les rappels commencent par des exemples visuels.

lay rah-PEHL koh-MAHNS par dayz eg-ZAHNPL vee-ZWEL.

The reminders start with visual examples.

Commencer par introduces the first step or element in a sequence.

French Vocabulary

au bureau phrase
oh byoo-ROH in the office

Nous avons des bacs de recyclage au bureau.

bacs de recyclage noun
bahk duh ray-see-KLAHZH recycling bins

Nous avons des bacs de recyclage au bureau.

consignes de tri noun
kohn-SEEN-yuh duh TREE sorting rules

Il faudrait rendre les consignes de tri plus simples.

étiquettes noun
ay-tee-KET labels

Les étiquettes sont probablement trop vagues.

exemples visuels noun
eg-ZAHNPL vee-ZWEL visual examples

Des exemples visuels près des bacs.

perplexes adj
pair-PLEHKS confused

Les gens semblent perplexes.

près de prep
preh duh near

Des exemples visuels près des bacs.

réduiraient verb
ray-dwee-RAY would reduce

Les exemples visuels réduiraient les erreurs.

rendre verb
RAHN-druh to make

Il faudrait rendre les consignes de tri plus simples.

usage quotidien phrase
oo-ZAHZH koh-tee-DYAN daily use

Pour un usage quotidien.

vagues adj
vahg vague

Les étiquettes sont probablement trop vagues.

visibles adj
vee-ZEE-bl visible

Les consignes de tri plus simples et plus visibles.

Quiz

Word Order

Arrange the words in the correct order.

That would make the change less disruptive.

Show AnswerCela rendrait le changement moins perturbant.

Spelling

Tap the letters to spell the word.

confused

Show Answerperplexes

to make

Show Answerrendre

vague

Show Answervagues

labels

Show Answerétiquettes