제
In 제 카드가, 제 means “my” before the noun 카드. It is the polite possessive form used when the speaker refers to their own card. A common reuse pattern is 제 + noun, such as 제 이름 for “my name.”
카드가
카드가 identifies the card as the subject of the sentence, meaning “the card” in 제 카드가 거절됐지만. The particle 가 marks what was declined. Use 가 after a subject that ends in a vowel sound.
거절됐지만
거절됐지만 means “was declined, but” in 제 카드가 거절됐지만. The form describes the card being declined and then links that fact to a contrasting statement about the account. Use -지만 to connect a statement with “but” or “although.”
계좌는
계좌는 introduces the account as the topic in 계좌는 아직 활성 상태여야 해요, meaning “as for the account.” The particle 는 contrasts the account with the card that was declined. It can follow a noun when shifting attention to a new topic.
아직
아직 means “still” here: the account should still be active. It shows that the expected state has not changed despite the card problem. A common pattern is 아직 + state or action, such as 아직 열려 있어요 for “it is still open.”
활성
활성 contributes the meaning “active” in 활성 상태여야 해요, describing the account’s current status. It is used before 상태 to specify what kind of state is meant. The reusable expression 활성 상태 means “active status” or “an active state.”
상태여야
상태여야 means “must be in the state of” in 활성 상태여야 해요. The ending -여야 expresses the required condition, so the account is expected to be in an active state. Use noun + -여야 하다 when saying that something must be a particular state or type.
해요
해요 politely completes the requirement in 활성 상태여야 해요, giving the sentence a polite conversational ending. In this expression, it helps form “should or must be active,” rather than meaning a separate action. The pattern -어야 해요 is commonly used for polite requirements.
시스템에서
시스템에서 presents the system as the source or place from which the detection occurred in 시스템에서 비정상적인 활동을 감지한 후. The particle 에서 marks where an action happens or originates. Use 장소나 시스템 + 에서 with actions performed in or by that place or system.
비정상적인
비정상적인 means “unusual” or “abnormal” and directly describes 활동 in 비정상적인 활동. It identifies activity as outside the expected pattern. A common reuse pattern is 비정상적인 + noun when describing something irregular.
활동을
활동을 means “activity” as the object detected in 비정상적인 활동을 감지한 후. The particle 을 marks what the system detected. Use 을 after a noun ending in a consonant when it is the object of an action.
감지한
감지한 means “detected” in 감지한 후, describing the system’s earlier detection. Its form modifies 후, so the sequence is “after detecting.” Use a verb form ending in -한 before a noun such as 후 when referring to a completed action.
후
후 means “after” in 감지한 후, placing the card block after the system detected unusual activity. It follows the action phrase 감지한 to establish the time order. A common pattern is verb + 후 for “after doing something.”
차단됐을
차단됐을 means “may have been blocked” in 차단됐을 수도 있어요. It describes the card as possibly having undergone blocking before the speaker gives the possibility ending. Use a past form before 수도 when considering whether something may have happened.
수도
수도 contributes possibility in 차단됐을 수도 있어요, meaning that the card may have been blocked. Here 수도 is part of the construction -을 수도 있다, not a separate statement about “also.” Use this pattern when presenting one possible explanation or outcome.
있어요
있어요 completes the possibility expression 차단됐을 수도 있어요, making it a polite statement that the event may have occurred. In this construction, it does not simply mean that something exists. The pattern -을 수도 있어요 is useful for saying “it may be possible” or “something may have happened.”
최근에
최근에 means “recently” in 최근에 여행 중이었는데, giving the time of the speaker’s travel. The particle 에 marks the time period associated with the event. Place it before the verb or state it modifies.
여행
여행 means “travel” in 여행 중이었는데. Together with 중, it describes being in the middle of a trip or traveling. A common pattern is 여행 + 중 for talking about being away on a trip.
중이었는데
중이었는데 means “was in the middle of it, but” in 여행 중이었는데. It gives the background situation of being on a trip and connects it to the possible cause that follows. Use noun + 중이다 for being in the middle of an activity, and -는데 to provide background or link to the next point.
그게
그게 means “that” as the subject in 그게 원인이었을 수도 있겠네요, referring here to the recent travel. The particle 게 is the subject-marked form used in this conversational expression. Use it when pointing back to a previously mentioned fact or situation.
원인이었을
원인이었을 means “may have been the cause” in 원인이었을 수도 있겠네요. It presents the earlier travel as a possible reason for the card problem. The form leads into 수도 to express a past possibility.
있겠네요
있겠네요 helps complete the tentative conclusion in 원인이었을 수도 있겠네요, conveying “I suppose that may have been the case.” The ending -네요 adds a sense of recognition or realization in the polite sentence. Use it when arriving at or acknowledging a conclusion in conversation.
그렇다면
그렇다면 means “if that is so” or “then” in 그렇다면 이해가 되지만. It takes the preceding explanation as a condition for the speaker’s response. Use it at the beginning of a reply when drawing a conclusion from what someone has just said.
이해가
이해가 means “understanding” as the subject of 이해가 되지만. In the expression 이해가 되다, it contributes to the meaning “make sense” or “be understandable.” The particle 가 marks 이해 as the subject of the expression.
되지만
되지만 means “makes sense, but” in 이해가 되지만. In this dialogue, 되다 combines with 이해가 to express that the explanation is understandable, while -지만 introduces the remaining requirement. Use 이해가 되다 when saying that something makes sense.
그래도
그래도 means “nevertheless” or “still” in 그래도 신원을 확인해야 해요. It acknowledges the reasonable explanation but keeps the requirement in place. Use it to continue with a necessary point despite what was just said.
신원을
신원을 means “identity” as the object that must be verified in 신원을 확인해야 해요. The formal noun 신원 is used in identity-checking contexts. The particle 을 marks the identity as the object of 확인하다.
확인해야
확인해야 means “must verify” in 신원을 확인해야 해요. The ending -어야 expresses that identity verification is required. Use the pattern 신원을 확인해야 하다 when explaining that someone’s identity must be checked.
모든
모든 means “every” or “all” in 모든 구매 내역, referring to the complete set of purchase records. It comes directly before the noun it limits. Use 모든 + noun when referring to the whole set rather than only selected items.
구매
구매 means “purchase” in 구매 내역, where it identifies the type of records being discussed. It functions as the first part of the compound expression for purchase history or details. A common pattern is 구매 + 내역 for records of purchases.
내역을
내역을 means “details” or “history” as the object in 모든 구매 내역을 하나씩 확인하지 않고도. Here it refers to the records of each purchase. The particle 을 marks those records as what would otherwise be checked.
하나씩
하나씩 means “one by one” in 하나씩 확인하지 않고도. The ending -씩 distributes the action across individual items. Use number or quantity + -씩 when doing something separately for each item.
확인하지
확인하지 is the “checking” part of 확인하지 않고도, which means “without checking.” It is followed by 않고도, so the form does not stand alone as a completed statement here. Use -지 않고도 after a verb when saying that something can happen without doing that action.
않고도
않고도 means “without doing so” in 확인하지 않고도. Together with 확인하지, it says that the purchase records need not be checked individually. The pattern -지 않고도 is useful for saying that an outcome is possible without a particular action.
확인할
확인할 means “to check” or “to review” in 확인할 수 있을까요? It appears before 수 to form an expression of possibility or ability. Use verb + -(으)ㄹ 수 있다 when asking whether an action can be done.
수
수 expresses possibility or ability in 확인할 수 있을까요? It is the noun used in the construction -(으)ㄹ 수 있다. This pattern keeps the action before 수, as in 확인할 수 있다, meaning “can check.”
있을까요
있을까요 makes 확인할 수 있을까요? a polite question about whether checking is possible. In this construction, it asks “Can we check it?” rather than simply asking whether something exists. Use -(으)ㄹ 수 있을까요? when politely asking about someone’s ability or permission to do something.
신원
신원 means “identity” in 신원 확인과, where it specifies what kind of confirmation is needed. It is a formal term commonly used in verification procedures. A common compound is 신원 확인 for identity verification.
확인과
확인과 means “verification and” in 신원 확인과 대략적인 파악만 필요해요. The particle 과 links identity verification with the general assessment of recent activity. Use 과 between nouns when listing two connected requirements.
활동에
활동에 means “about activity” in 활동에 대한 대략적인 파악만. The particle 에 is part of the expression 에 대한, which introduces the topic being described. Use noun + 에 대한 + noun for “a noun about or regarding another noun.”
대한
대한 means “regarding” in 활동에 대한 대략적인 파악만. Together with 활동에, it makes the phrase “an assessment regarding activity.” The reusable pattern 에 대한 is placed before a noun to describe what that noun concerns.
대략적인
대략적인 means “general” or “rough” in 대략적인 파악만. It limits the assessment to an overall sense rather than a detailed account. Use 대략적인 before a noun when the information is approximate or broad.
파악만
파악만 means “only an assessment or understanding” in 대략적인 파악만 필요해요. The particle 만 limits what is needed to this general assessment. Use noun + 만 when emphasizing that nothing more than that item is required.
필요해요
필요해요 means “is needed” in 신원 확인과 대략적인 파악만 필요해요. It politely states the requirements for the support process. A common pattern is noun + 이/가 필요해요 for saying that something is needed.
거래
거래 means “transaction” in 거래 내역, referring to financial transactions. It combines with 내역 to describe a transaction history or record. Use 거래 내역 when discussing recorded transactions rather than purchases specifically.
나열하는
나열하는 means “listing” in 나열하는 것보다. It describes the action of listing every transaction and modifies 것, which turns that action into something being compared. Use the pattern verb + -는 것 when treating an ongoing action as a thing or activity.
것보다
것보다 means “than doing or having something” in 나열하는 것보다. Here it creates the comparison “than listing every transaction.” Use verb + -는 것보다 to compare one action or option with another.
더
더 means “more” in 더 합리적으로 들리네요. It marks the comparative judgment that the proposed process sounds more reasonable. Place 더 before the adjective or adverb being compared.
합리적으로
합리적으로 means “reasonably” in 더 합리적으로 들리네요, describing how the proposal sounds. Its adverb form modifies 들리다. Use -적으로 to make an adverb from a quality such as 합리적.
들리네요
들리네요 means “sounds” or “seems” in 더 합리적으로 들리네요. It expresses the speaker’s reaction that the proposal gives a reasonable impression, and -네요 adds a sense of realization. Use adjective or adverb + 들리다 when giving an impression of how something sounds.
신원이
신원이 means “identity” as the subject in 신원이 확인되면. The particle 이 marks the identity as what becomes verified. Use 이 after a subject noun ending in a consonant.
확인되면
확인되면 means “once it is verified” in 신원이 확인되면. The passive form shows that the identity receives verification, and -면 sets the condition or time for the next action. Use -되면 after a passive or change-of-state verb when saying “when or once it becomes.”
보통
보통 means “usually” in 보통 바로, describing what generally happens after verification. It gives the statement a normal or customary meaning rather than an absolute one. Place it before the action or result it qualifies.
바로
바로 means “right away” in 바로 차단 조치를 검토할 수 있어요. It emphasizes that the review can begin without delay after identity verification. Use it before a verb to indicate immediate action.
차단
차단 means “blocking” or “a block” in 차단 조치를 검토할 수 있어요. It specifies the type of measure being reviewed. The compound 차단 조치 refers to an action taken to block something.
조치를
조치를 means “measure” or “action” as the object in 차단 조치를 검토할 수 있어요. Together with 차단, it means the blocking action or measure. The particle 를 marks that measure as what can be reviewed.
검토할
검토할 means “to review” in 검토할 수 있어요. It appears before 수 to form the possibility expression “can review,” referring here to reviewing the block. Use verb + -(으)ㄹ 수 있다 when stating that an action can be carried out.