De
“De” means “the” here and comes before the specific cooking class in “De kookles”. A reusable pattern is de + noun. You use it when referring to a particular person, thing, or event.
kookles
“Kookles” means “cooking class” in this dialogue. It names the class that A attended and evaluated. You use it when talking about a lesson focused on cooking.
was
“Was” means “was” in “De kookles was nuttiger”. It is the past form of zijn used to describe the class in the past. A reusable pattern is a subject + was + description when giving a past evaluation.
nuttiger
“Nuttiger” means “more useful” in the comparison with the speaker’s expectation. It is the comparative form used before “dan” in “nuttiger dan ik had verwacht”. You use this pattern to compare the usefulness of one thing with an expectation or another thing.
dan
In “nuttiger dan ik had verwacht”, “dan” means “than” and introduces the comparison. In “Dan was het de moeite waard”, it means “then” and introduces a conclusion. Use “dan” after a comparative for a comparison, or at the start of a sentence to refer to a result or next step.
ik
“Ik” means “I” and is the speaker referring to themself. It is the subject in “ik had verwacht” and “Ik heb ook geleerd”. You use “ik” before a verb when describing your own experience, action, or opinion.
had
“Had” is the past form of hebben in “ik had verwacht” and refers to what the speaker expected earlier. Together with “verwacht”, it describes an expectation that existed before the class was evaluated. A reusable pattern is ik had + a completed action when recounting an earlier expectation or experience.
verwacht
“Verwacht” means “expected” in “ik had verwacht”. It is the form of verwachten used after “had” to describe the earlier expectation. You use it when saying what you thought would happen before an event.
Welke
“Welke” means “which” or “what” in “Welke techniek”. It asks the listener to identify a particular technique. A reusable pattern is welke + noun when asking someone to choose or name one item from possible items.
techniek
“Techniek” means “technique” in the cooking context. It is the thing the listener learned from the chef. You use it when discussing a particular method or skill used to do something.
heb
“Heb” is a form of hebben used with “geleerd” in “Ik heb ook geleerd”, and it also begins the question “Heb je feedback ... gekregen?”. It helps form a statement about a completed experience or a question about one. Reusable patterns are ik heb + completed action and heb je + completed action?
je
“Je” means “you” in “Heb je feedback ... gekregen?”. It refers directly to the person being asked about their experience. You commonly use it after “heb” in a question addressed to one person.
van
“Van” means “from” in “van de chef” and identifies the source of the learning. The chef is the person from whom the technique was learned. A reusable pattern is geleerd van + person when naming who taught or influenced you.
chef
“Chef” means “chef” in “de chef”. It identifies the cooking teacher who demonstrated the technique. You use it when referring to the professional responsible for the cooking instruction.
geleerd
“Geleerd” means “learned” in “heb je ... geleerd” and “heb ... geleerd”. It is the form of leren used with “heb” to describe something acquired through experience or instruction. You use it when recounting a skill, fact, or technique that someone learned.
Ze
“Ze” means “she” here and refers to the chef who taught the class. It is the subject of “Ze liet ons zien”. You use it to refer back to a female person already identified in the conversation.
liet
“Liet” is the past form of laten in “Ze liet ons zien” and introduces what the chef showed the group. In this construction, the chef caused the learners to see something. A reusable pattern is liet + person + zien when describing that someone showed another person something.
ons
“Ons” means “us” in “liet ons zien”. It identifies the people who were shown the cooking technique. You use it as the object after a verb when the action is directed toward the speaker and others.
zien
“Zien” means “see”, but in “liet ons zien” it is part of the expression meaning “showed us”. The combination with “liet ons” explains that the chef demonstrated something to the group. You use “zien” in “zien hoe” when introducing what someone is shown or observes.
hoe
“Hoe” means “how” and introduces the method in “hoe we rustig kruiden en vaak proeven”. It connects the demonstration with the actions the learners should perform. A reusable pattern is hoe + clause when explaining how an action is done.
we
“We” means “we” and refers to the learners performing the cooking actions. It is the subject in “hoe we rustig kruiden”. You use it before a verb when describing an action done by the speaker together with other people.
rustig
“Rustig” means “slowly” or “calmly” here and describes the manner of seasoning. It suggests working without rushing while following the technique. A reusable pattern is rustig + verb when advising someone to perform an action calmly or at an unhurried pace.
kruiden
“Kruiden” means “to season” in this cooking context. It describes adding seasoning to food as part of the demonstrated method. You use it when talking about seasoning a dish or another food.
en
“En” means “and” and links “kruiden” with “proeven”. It shows that the two cooking actions belong together. A reusable pattern is X en Y when joining two related actions or ideas.
vaak
“Vaak” means “often” and describes how frequently the learners taste the food. It appears before “proeven” in “vaak proeven”. You use it before a verb when an action happens repeatedly.
proeven
“Proeven” means “to taste” in the cooking instruction. It describes tasting the food repeatedly to check its flavor while cooking. You use it when sampling food to evaluate or adjust it.
Dat
“Dat” means “that” in “Dat is een praktische gewoonte” and refers to the technique of seasoning and tasting. It points back to the previous idea rather than introducing a new object. You use “Dat is ...” to respond to or evaluate something just mentioned.
is
“Is” means “is” in “Dat is een praktische gewoonte”. It links “Dat” with the description that follows. It is the present form of zijn used when identifying or evaluating something now.
een
“Een” means “a” or “an” in “een praktische gewoonte”. It introduces one habit without presenting it as a previously identified specific habit. A reusable pattern is een + adjective + noun when introducing one item or idea.
praktische
“Praktische” means “practical” and describes “gewoonte”. It presents the habit as useful in real cooking rather than merely theoretical. You use it before a noun when describing something useful for applying in practice.
gewoonte
“Gewoonte” means “habit” in “een praktische gewoonte”. It refers to seasoning slowly and tasting often as a repeated way of working. You use it when describing an action or routine that someone regularly follows.
niet
“Niet” means “not” and negates the claim in “niet alleen een recept”. It shows that the technique is more than just a recipe. You use “niet” to reject or limit a description, often before the phrase being negated.
alleen
“Alleen” means “only” or “just” in “niet alleen een recept”. It limits the description by saying that the technique is not merely a recipe. You use it with “niet” when explaining that something has an additional quality or function.
recept
“Recept” means “recipe” in “een recept”. It is contrasted with the broader practical habit of seasoning and tasting. You use it when referring to written or structured instructions for preparing food.
ook
“Ook” means “also” in “Ik heb ook geleerd”. It adds portion control as another thing the speaker learned in addition to the earlier technique. A reusable pattern is ook + verb phrase when adding another fact, action, or experience.
portiegrootte
“Portiegrootte” means “portion size” and is the thing the speaker learned to determine better. It refers to how much food belongs in one portion. You use it when discussing serving amounts or controlling the size of a meal.
beter
“Beter” means “better” in “beter kan bepalen”. It describes an improved ability to control portion size. You use “beter” before a verb when saying that an action can now be performed more effectively than before.
kan
“Kan” means “can” in “kan bepalen” and expresses ability or possibility. It is followed by the infinitive “bepalen”. A reusable pattern is kan + infinitive when describing what someone is able or able to learn to do.
bepalen
“Bepalen” means “to determine” or “to control” in relation to portion size. It is the infinitive after “kan” in “kan bepalen”. You use it when deciding or controlling a quantity, limit, or other detail.
feedback
“Feedback” means “feedback” in “feedback op je gerecht”. It refers to comments or an evaluation of the dish. A reusable pattern is feedback op + subject when naming what the feedback concerns.
op
“Op” means “on” or “about” in “feedback op je gerecht”. It links the feedback to the dish being evaluated. You use “feedback op” before the thing, performance, or work that someone comments on.
gerecht
“Gerecht” means “dish” in “je gerecht”. It refers to the prepared food the speaker made during the class. You use it when discussing one prepared item as part of a meal or cooking activity.
gekregen
“Gekregen” means “received” or “gotten” in “feedback ... gekregen”. It is the form of krijgen used with “heb” in the question about receiving feedback. You use it when asking or saying whether someone obtained something, such as feedback.
saus
“Saus” means “sauce” in “De saus was goed”. It is the food component being evaluated positively. You use it when referring to a liquid or semi-liquid accompaniment prepared for a dish.
goed
“Goed” means “good” or “working well” in “De saus was goed”. It evaluates the result of the sauce rather than describing its physical form. A reusable pattern is iets was goed when giving a positive evaluation of something in the past.
maar
“Maar” means “but” in “De saus was goed, maar ...” and introduces a contrasting problem with the pasta. In “maar een paar dingen”, it means “only” and limits the quantity. You use it to contrast two ideas or to limit what is being described.
pasta
“Pasta” means “pasta” and is the food that was cooked too long. It is the object of the cooking action in “de pasta te lang gekookt”. You use it when discussing this type of food or a pasta dish.
te
“Te” means “too” in “te lang gekookt” and shows that the cooking lasted beyond the intended amount. It comes before “lang” to express excessive duration. A reusable pattern is te + adjective or adverb when something exceeds the suitable degree.
lang
“Lang” means “long” here in relation to cooking time. In “te lang”, it says that the pasta was cooked for too much time. You use it with actions involving duration, especially when saying how long something continued.
gekookt
“Gekookt” means “cooked” in “de pasta te lang gekookt”. It is the form of koken used with “heb” to describe the completed cooking action. You use it when recounting that food was prepared by boiling or cooking.
makkelijk
“Makkelijk” means “easy” in “makkelijk te verbeteren”. It reassures the speaker that the problem can be corrected without much difficulty. A reusable pattern is makkelijk te + infinitive when describing an action that is easy to perform.
verbeteren
“Verbeteren” means “to improve” in “te verbeteren”. It describes correcting the cooking result or making it better next time. You use it with a thing or result that can be changed for the better.
met
“Met” means “with” in “met de juiste timing”. It identifies the means or condition that helps improve the cooking. A reusable pattern is met + noun when naming what is used or applied to achieve a result.
juiste
“Juiste” means “right” or “correct” in “de juiste timing”. It describes the timing needed to cook the pasta properly. You use it before a noun when referring to the suitable or correct choice for a situation.
timing
“Timing” means “timing” in “de juiste timing”. It refers to choosing the correct moment or duration for the cooking action. You use it when the success of an action depends on doing it at the appropriate time.
Door
“Door” means “because of” in “Door de les heb ik meer vertrouwen gekregen”. It introduces the class as the cause of the speaker’s increased confidence. A reusable pattern is Door + noun when explaining what caused a result.
les
“Les” means “class” or “lesson” in “Door de les”. Here it refers to the cooking class discussed throughout the dialogue. You use it when referring to an organized period of teaching or learning.
meer
“Meer” means “more” in “meer vertrouwen gekregen”. It shows that the speaker now has an increased amount of confidence. A reusable pattern is meer + noun when comparing a larger amount with an earlier amount.
vertrouwen
“Vertrouwen” means “confidence” in “meer vertrouwen”. It refers to the speaker’s belief that they can invite friends and host dinner. You use it with “gekregen om vrienden uit te nodigen” when describing increased confidence to do something.
om
“Om” introduces the purpose in “om vrienden uit te nodigen”. It connects the confidence with the action the speaker now feels ready to take. A reusable pattern is om + infinitive when explaining an intention or purpose.
vrienden
“Vrienden” means “friends” in “vrienden uit te nodigen”. It identifies the people the speaker wants to invite for dinner. You use it when talking about inviting friends to an activity or meal.
uit
“Uit” is the separable part of the verb used in “uit te nodigen”. It combines with “nodigen” to express inviting. With “te”, the parts appear together as “uit te nodigen”, a pattern used after “om” to describe a purpose.
nodigen
“Nodigen” contributes the meaning “invite” in “uit te nodigen”. Together with “uit”, it forms the separable verb used for inviting the friends. You use “uit te nodigen” after “om” when describing the purpose of an action.
voor
“Voor” means “for” in “voor het avondeten”. It identifies the meal that the friends are being invited to. A reusable pattern is voor + noun when naming the occasion or purpose of an invitation.
het
“Het” means “the” in “het avondeten”. It introduces the specific evening meal as the occasion for the invitation. You use it before a noun when referring to a particular meal, event, or thing.
avondeten
“Avondeten” means “dinner” or “evening meal” in “het avondeten”. It names the meal the speaker hopes to prepare for friends. You use it when talking about the main meal eaten in the evening.
al
In “ook al heb je maar een paar dingen geleerd”, “al” contributes to the concessive meaning “even” in the expression “ook al”, meaning “even if”. The expression introduces a condition that does not change the conclusion. A reusable pattern is ook al + clause when acknowledging a limitation while maintaining the main point.
paar
“Paar” means “few” in “een paar dingen” and indicates a small number of things. It is used with “dingen” to describe the limited number of items learned. A reusable pattern is een paar + plural noun when referring to a small number.
dingen
“Dingen” means “things” in “een paar dingen”. It refers generally to the few techniques or points learned in the class. You use it when the specific items are understood from the context or are not being named individually.
de moeite waard
The whole expression “de moeite waard” means “worth it”. Within it, “de” is the article, “moeite” refers to the effort or trouble involved, and “waard” says that this effort has sufficient value. It is used when evaluating whether an experience or action merits the time or effort, as in “was het de moeite waard”.