De
De is the definite article in De maaltijd and de gangen, referring to the specific meal and courses being discussed. It appears before the noun and is commonly used for a known or previously identified thing.
maaltijd
Maaltijd means meal here: the complete food served to the guest. In De maaltijd, it follows the definite article; it is useful when discussing the meal as one experience.
was
Was means was in De maaltijd was lekker and describes the meal in the past. It is the past form used with the singular subject De maaltijd.
lekker
Lekker describes the meal as tasty or enjoyable here. In De maaltijd was lekker, it comes after was to describe the meal, and it is also commonly used for food that tastes good.
maar
Maar means but and introduces the contrast between the enjoyable meal and its uneven timing. It connects two opposing points, as in De maaltijd was lekker, maar ...
timing
Timing refers to the spacing and scheduling of the courses here. In de timing tussen de gangen, it is a common restaurant-related word for when things happen.
tussen
Tussen means between and identifies the relationship between the courses in tussen de gangen. It is commonly followed by the things or people that lie between one another.
gangen
Gangen means courses in the restaurant context, referring to the separate parts of the meal. In tussen de gangen, it identifies the courses whose timing is being discussed.
voelde
Voelde means felt here, describing how the timing seemed to the guest. In voelde ongelijkmatig aan, it is part of a construction used to describe an experienced impression.
ongelijkmatig
Ongelijkmatig means uneven or irregular here, describing the inconsistent spacing between courses. It modifies the impression expressed by voelde ... aan and is useful for giving specific feedback about an irregular process.
aan
Aan has two roles in this dialogue. In voelde ongelijkmatig aan, it completes the expression for how something feels or comes across; in aan de manager, it marks the recipient of something being passed on.
Het
In Het spijt me, Het is the pronoun it in the fixed apology meaning I am sorry. In Het personeel, Het is the definite article before personeel, so the exact function depends on the surrounding words.
spijt
Spijt expresses regret in the fixed apology Het spijt me. The construction is used when acknowledging that something unpleasant happened to someone.
me
Me means me in Het spijt me, identifying the person who feels regret in the apology. It is used here as the object pronoun after spijt.
dat
Dat introduces information connected to what comes before, as in dat het druk was and dat u wist wat er was gebeurd. It also links serviceprobleem to the clause dat we kunnen oplossen.
tempo
Tempo means pace or pacing here, referring to how quickly the meal progressed. In het tempo de maaltijd in de weg stond, it identifies the process that interfered with the meal.
in
In is part of the fixed expression in de weg staan, meaning to obstruct or get in the way. Here it combines with weg and stond rather than giving the meal a simple location.
weg
Weg is part of in de weg staan, which means to get in the way in this dialogue. Together with in and stond, it describes something that interferes with the meal.
stond
Stond means stood in the expression in de weg stond, which means got in the way here. It is the past form used to describe how the pacing affected the meal.
Ik
Ik means I and is the subject in Ik begrijp dat het druk was and the other statements beginning with Ik. It identifies the speaker as the person understanding, asking, or wanting something.
begrijp
Begrijp means understand in Ik begrijp dat het druk was. It is used to acknowledge another person’s situation before giving further feedback.
druk
Druk means busy here, describing the restaurant’s circumstances. In dat het druk was, it explains the situation that the speaker understands.
sommige
Sommige means some and identifies part of the courses in sommige gangen. It is used before a plural noun when only part of a group is meant.
kwamen
Kwamen means came or arrived here, referring to courses arriving at the table. In sommige gangen kwamen te snel na elkaar, it describes what happened to the plural subject gangen.
te
Te means too in te snel and te laat, showing that the timing was excessive in one direction. It is commonly placed before an adjective or adverb to express an unwanted degree.
snel
Snel means quickly here, describing how close together some courses arrived. In te snel na elkaar, it forms a useful pattern for saying that events happened too quickly one after another.
na
Na means after in na elkaar and helps express sequence. Together with elkaar, it describes events occurring one after another rather than independently.
elkaar
Elkaar means each other in na elkaar, referring to the courses in relation to one another. The expression na elkaar is used for events that follow one another in sequence.
en
En means and and joins the two observations about the courses. It connects the courses that arrived too close together with the others that arrived late.
andere
Andere means others here, referring to the remaining courses rather than the ones already mentioned. It can stand on its own when the omitted noun is clear from the context.
juist
Juist emphasizes the contrast in andere kwamen juist te laat: those other courses, by contrast, arrived late. It is useful when correcting or highlighting the precise opposite of the preceding point.
laat
Laat means late here, describing when the other courses arrived. In juist te laat, it appears after te to express that the delay was excessive.
had
Had means had in Dat had beter ... moeten worden and places the situation in the past. Together with moeten worden afgestemd, it expresses how the coordination should have been handled.
beter
Beter means better here, indicating that the coordination should have been improved. It modifies the required way of coordinating the courses for the table.
voor
Voor means for in voor de hele tafel, identifying the group the coordination should cover. It commonly comes before the person, group, or purpose involved.
hele
Hele means whole or entire in de hele tafel. It emphasizes that the coordination should apply to the table as a whole, not just to part of it.
tafel
Tafel means table here, referring to the guests and meal arrangement at one table. In voor de hele tafel, it identifies the group for which the coordination was needed.
afgestemd
Afgestemd means coordinated or aligned here, describing how the service should have been organized. In afgestemd moeten worden, it refers to coordination carried out across the table.
moeten
Moeten expresses should or have to in afgestemd moeten worden. Here it contributes the idea that better coordination was required, and it is followed by worden in the passive construction.
worden
Worden means be in afgestemd moeten worden, completing the passive idea of being coordinated. It follows the participle afgestemd in this construction.
vraag
Vraag means ask for or request in Ik vraag niet om iets extra's. It presents the speaker’s statement as a request, and the pattern vraag om is used for what is being requested.
niet
Niet means not and negates the request in Ik vraag niet om iets extra's. It makes clear that the speaker is not seeking an additional benefit.
om
Om follows vraag in vraag om iets extra's and introduces what is being requested. The pattern vragen om is commonly used when asking for something.
iets
Iets means something or anything here, referring generally to an additional item or benefit. In iets extra's, it comes before the description of what is being requested.
extra's
Extra's means extras here, referring to additional compensation or service. The apostrophe marks the plural form of extra, and iets extra's means something extra.
wilde
Wilde means wanted in Ik wilde alleen dat u wist wat er was gebeurd. It presents the speaker’s intention in the past and helps make the statement sound measured rather than demanding.
alleen
Alleen means only or just here, limiting the speaker’s intention to informing the staff. In Ik wilde alleen dat ..., it softens the purpose of the complaint.
u
U means you in the formal or polite form in dat u wist. It addresses the restaurant staff member respectfully and is used here as the person who was meant to know what happened.
wist
Wist means knew in dat u wist wat er was gebeurd. It is the past form used for the knowledge the speaker wanted the staff member to have.
wat
Wat means what in wat er was gebeurd, introducing the information about the event. It is used here to refer to the thing that happened.
er
Er has no separate word-for-word translation in wat er was gebeurd and helps form the natural clause about what happened. Here it is not the location word there; it supports the clause describing the event.
gebeurd
Gebeurd means happened in wat er was gebeurd. Together with was, it describes an event that had already taken place, which is why it fits the speaker’s account of the earlier service problem.
waardeer
Waardeer means appreciate in Ik waardeer de details. It expresses positive recognition of the guest’s specific information and commonly takes the thing being appreciated as its object.
details
Details means details here, referring to the specific information about the course timing. In Ik waardeer de details, it is the information that the staff member appreciates.
want
Want means because here and introduces the reason for appreciating the details. It connects the positive response to the explanation that the details reveal a fixable service problem.
ze
Ze means they here and refers back to the plural noun details. It avoids repeating the noun while making the details the subject of wijzen.
wijzen
Wijzen means point or indicate here, with the details indicating a service problem. It is used with op in wijzen op to identify what the information reveals.
op
Op completes wijzen op, meaning point to or indicate in this dialogue. The pattern wijzen op is used when evidence or information directs attention to an issue.
een
Een means a or an in een serviceprobleem. It introduces one service problem without presenting it as a previously identified specific problem.
serviceprobleem
Serviceprobleem means service issue here, referring to a problem in how the restaurant service was organized. It is the issue that the staff believe they can address.
we
We means we in dat we kunnen oplossen, referring to the restaurant team. It identifies the people who have the ability and responsibility to resolve the service problem.
kunnen
Kunnen means can here, expressing ability or possibility in we kunnen oplossen. It is followed by the infinitive oplossen, a common modal-verb pattern.
oplossen
Oplossen means fix or resolve here, with the service problem as the issue to be addressed. It commonly takes a problem, mistake, or practical issue as its object.
personeel
Personeel means staff here, referring collectively to the restaurant employees. In Het personeel bleef ..., it is the group whose behavior is being assessed.
bleef
Bleef means remained or stayed in Het personeel bleef de hele tijd beleefd. It emphasizes that the staff continued to be polite throughout the situation.
tijd
Tijd means time in de hele tijd, referring to the complete duration of the interaction. The expression de hele tijd is commonly used to mean throughout the whole period.
beleefd
Beleefd means polite here, describing the staff’s behavior. With bleef, it expresses a quality that continued throughout the interaction.
dus
Dus means so or therefore and introduces the conclusion drawn from the staff remaining polite. It connects the observation about behavior with the judgment that the issue was operational rather than personal.
lijkt
Lijkt means seems here, presenting the speaker’s conclusion as an assessment rather than an absolute claim. In het lijkt meer iets operationeels dan iets persoonlijks, it introduces a comparison between two possible explanations.
meer
Meer means more in meer iets operationeels dan iets persoonlijks. It forms the first part of the comparison meer ... dan, meaning more one thing than another.
operationeels
Operationeels describes something operational in iets operationeels, meaning related to how the service was organized or run. The -s form is used after iets, and it is contrasted with iets persoonlijks.
dan
Dan means than in meer iets operationeels dan iets persoonlijks. It introduces the second side of the comparison after meer.
persoonlijks
Persoonlijks describes something personal in iets persoonlijks, referring to a matter involving an individual rather than the service process. The -s form follows iets and creates the contrast with iets operationeels.
zal
Zal means will in Ik zal dat onderscheid aan de manager doorgeven. It marks the staff member’s intended future action of communicating the distinction.
onderscheid
Onderscheid means distinction here, referring to the difference between an operational problem and a personal one. In dat onderscheid, it identifies the specific point that will be communicated.
manager
Manager means manager here, referring to the person who should receive the staff member’s report. In aan de manager, it follows the recipient-marking preposition aan.
doorgeven
Doorgeven means pass on or relay here, referring to communicating the distinction to the manager. It commonly takes information as the thing passed on and a recipient introduced with aan, as in onderscheid aan de manager doorgeven.