Evaluating a workshop beyond satisfaction scores | Learn Dutch in English

Dutch lesson set in a contemporary Amsterdam everyday setting: After a professional workshop, two colleagues plan a short evaluation that measures later application rather than satisfaction alone..

EN → NL / Level: B2

About This Lesson

Use Evaluating a workshop beyond satisfaction scores to practice Dutch conversation, pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and quizzes.

Dialogue

A

Na de workshop hebben we meer nodig dan tevredenheidsscores.

nah duh WURK-shop HEB-buhn vuh MAYR NOH-dikh dahn tuh-VRAY-duhn-hights-SKOHRS After the workshop, we need more than satisfaction scores.
B

We zouden moeten meten of deelnemers de methode later toepassen.

vuh ZOW-duhn MOO-tuhn MAY-tuhn off DAYL-nay-murs duh may-TOH-duh LAH-tur uh-TOH-puh-sun We should measure whether participants apply the method later.
A

Toepassing is moeilijker te meten, maar belangrijker.

uh-TOH-puh-sing iss MOOY-luh-kur tuh MAY-tuhn, mahr buh-LAHNG-rik-ur Application is harder to measure, but it matters more.
B

We zouden na de uitvoering om korte reflectienotities kunnen vragen.

vuh ZOW-duhn nah duh OYT-VOO-ring om KOR-tuh ray-flek-SEE-noh-tee-tsus KUN-nun VRAH-khun We could ask for brief reflection notes after implementation.
A

Daarmee zouden we zien wat er veranderd is en wat moeilijk bleef.

DAHR-may ZOW-duhn vuh ZEEN vaht ur vuh-RAHN-dert iss en vaht MOOY-luk blayf That would show what changed and what remained difficult.
B

Het levert ons ook materiaal op om de volgende sessie te verbeteren.

ut LAY-vurt ons ohk mah-tay-ree-AHL op om duh VOL-khun-duh SESS-see tuh vuh-BAY-tuh-run It also gives us material for improving the next session.
A

Laten we het formulier kort genoeg houden om het eerlijk in te vullen.

LAH-tun vuh ut for-moo-LEER kort khuh-NOOK HOW-dun om ut AYR-luk in tuh VUL-lun Let's keep the form short enough to complete honestly.
B

Overmatige evaluatie leidt vaak tot onzorgvuldige antwoorden.

oh-vur-MAH-tuh-khuh ay-vah-loo-AH-tsee layt fahk tot on-ZORK-vul-duh AHNT-wohr-dun Excessive evaluation often produces careless answers.

Word by Word

Na “Na” means after here and introduces the time following the workshop in “Na de workshop”. It is used before an event or period when describing what happens afterward.
de “de” is the definite article meaning the in “de workshop”. It appears directly before this noun and identifies a specific workshop.
workshop “workshop” refers to the professional workshop discussed in the dialogue. This borrowed noun can be used for a practical training or working session.
hebben In “hebben we meer nodig”, “hebben” is part of the expression meaning need rather than simply possess. The thing that is needed appears with this expression, as in the exact phrase “meer nodig”.
we “we” means we and refers to the two colleagues speaking together. It is the subject of “hebben we meer nodig” and can be used for a group that includes the speaker.
meer “meer” means more here: the speakers need more than satisfaction scores. It is used before “dan” when comparing the needed amount with something else.
nodig “nodig” means needed or necessary in the expression “meer nodig”. Together with “hebben”, it describes something the speakers require for their evaluation.
dan “dan” means than in the comparison “meer nodig dan tevredenheidsscores”. It introduces the thing against which the greater need is compared.
tevredenheidsscores “tevredenheidsscores” means satisfaction scores, the numerical evaluations collected immediately after the workshop. The compound refers specifically to scores measuring how satisfied participants were.
zouden “zouden” contributes the tentative or polite idea of would in “We zouden moeten meten”. With “moeten”, it presents the measurement as a recommendation rather than a direct command.
moeten “moeten” means should or ought to in “zouden moeten meten”. It expresses the recommended obligation to measure something, followed here by the action “meten”.
meten “meten” means measure in “moeten meten”. Here it refers to assessing whether participants later apply the method, and it can be followed by a question clause introduced by “of”.
of “of” means whether in “meten of deelnemers de methode later toepassen”. It introduces the embedded question about whether the participants apply the method.
deelnemers “deelnemers” means participants in the workshop. In “deelnemers de methode later toepassen”, it is the people whose later action is being measured.
methode “methode” means method, referring to the approach taught in the workshop. It is the object of “toepassen” in “de methode later toepassen”.
later “later” means later, referring to a time after the workshop rather than during it. It modifies the application of the method in “de methode later toepassen”.
toepassen “toepassen” means apply or put into practice in “de methode later toepassen”. It is used with the method as its object when someone uses a learned approach in practice.
Toepassing “Toepassing” means application here: the later use of the method in practice. It is the noun related to “toepassen” and is the subject of “Toepassing is moeilijker te meten”.
is “is” links “Toepassing” with the description “moeilijker te meten”. Here it states how difficult the application is to measure.
moeilijker “moeilijker” means harder or more difficult in “moeilijker te meten”. It compares measuring application with the easier measurement of satisfaction scores implied by the discussion.
te In “moeilijker te meten”, “te” marks the infinitive “meten” after the expression describing difficulty. The same infinitive-marking use appears in “te verbeteren” and “te vragen” elsewhere in the dialogue.
maar “maar” means but and contrasts the greater difficulty of measuring application with its greater importance. It connects the two opposing descriptions in “moeilijker te meten, maar belangrijker”.
belangrijker “belangrijker” means more important in the comparison with satisfaction scores. It states that application has greater value for the evaluation even though it is harder to measure.
uitvoering “uitvoering” means implementation or carrying something out in “na de uitvoering”. Here it refers to the period when the workshop method is put into practice.
om In “om korte reflectienotities ... vragen”, “om” belongs to the expression for asking for something. In “om het eerlijk in te vullen”, it instead introduces the purpose of completing the form honestly.
korte “korte” means brief or short and describes the reflection notes in “korte reflectienotities”. It places the emphasis on keeping the requested notes limited in length.
reflectienotities “reflectienotities” means reflection notes: short written comments about what happened during implementation. The compound identifies the notes being requested from participants.
kunnen “kunnen” contributes the idea of could in “zouden ... kunnen vragen”. Together with “zouden”, it presents asking for notes as a possible proposal.
vragen “vragen” means ask in “om korte reflectienotities kunnen vragen”. Here it describes requesting the notes from participants, with “om” introducing what is requested.
Daarmee “Daarmee” means with that or by doing that, referring to the proposed reflection notes and evaluation approach. In “Daarmee zouden we zien”, it introduces the means by which the colleagues could find out what changed.
zien “zien” literally means see, but in “zouden we zien wat er veranderd is” it means find out or observe the results. It is followed by the information the colleagues want to determine.
wat “wat” means what in “wat er veranderd is” and “wat moeilijk bleef”. It introduces the specific result or issue being identified.
er “er” is used in the clause “wat er veranderd is” as part of the way Dutch expresses that something changed. It does not refer to a separate place here; the clause focuses on what changed.
veranderd “veranderd” means changed in “wat er veranderd is”. It describes the result that the reflection notes would help the colleagues identify.
en “en” means and and joins the two findings in “wat er veranderd is en wat moeilijk bleef”. It connects the changes with the difficulties that continued.
moeilijk “moeilijk” means difficult in “wat moeilijk bleef”. It describes the aspects that continued to present difficulty during or after implementation.
bleef “bleef” means remained or continued in “wat moeilijk bleef”. It shows that the difficulty was still present rather than having disappeared.
Het “Het” means it in “Het levert ons ook materiaal op”. It refers back to the proposed evaluation approach or reflection process as the thing that provides useful material.
levert In “levert ons ook materiaal op”, “levert” is part of the split expression meaning provides or yields. The useful result appears as “materiaal”, while “op” completes the expression later in the sentence.
ons “ons” means us in “levert ons ook materiaal op”. It identifies the colleagues as the people who receive the material.
ook “ook” means also and adds the benefit of providing material to the earlier benefit of showing what changed. It appears before “materiaal” in “ons ook materiaal”.
materiaal “materiaal” means material here, referring to information that can be used to improve the next session. It is what the evaluation process provides in “levert ons ook materiaal op”.
op In “levert ons ook materiaal op”, “op” is the separable particle that completes the expression meaning provide or yield. It is placed at the end of the main clause while “levert” appears earlier.
volgende “volgende” means next in “de volgende sessie”. It identifies the session that comes after the current workshop or evaluation.
sessie “sessie” means session, referring here to the next workshop session. It is the object of the improvement described in “de volgende sessie te verbeteren”.
verbeteren “verbeteren” means improve in “om de volgende sessie te verbeteren”. It expresses the purpose for which the collected material will be used.
Laten “Laten” begins the suggestion “Laten we het formulier ... houden”, meaning let’s keep the form that way. This construction is used to propose a joint action to the other speaker.
formulier “formulier” means form, specifically the evaluation form that participants will complete. It is the object being kept short in “het formulier kort genoeg houden”.
kort “kort” means short in “het formulier kort genoeg houden”. It describes the desired length of the form rather than the duration of an event.
genoeg “genoeg” means enough in “kort genoeg”. It indicates that the form should be sufficiently short to make honest completion possible.
houden “houden” means keep in “Laten we het formulier kort genoeg houden”. Here it means maintain the form in the condition described by “kort genoeg”.
eerlijk “eerlijk” means honestly in “het eerlijk in te vullen”. It describes the manner in which participants should complete the form, without careless or insincere responses.
in In “in te vullen”, “in” is part of the expression meaning fill in or complete. It stays together conceptually with “vullen”, although the particle appears before the infinitive marker.
vullen In “in te vullen”, “vullen” contributes the action of filling, and the full expression means fill in or complete the form. The object being completed is “het formulier”.
Overmatige “Overmatige” means excessive and describes evaluation that goes beyond a useful amount in “Overmatige evaluatie”. It warns that too much evaluation can reduce the care taken with answers.
evaluatie “evaluatie” means evaluation, referring to the process of assessing the workshop and its later application. In “Overmatige evaluatie”, it is the subject of the statement about careless answers.
leidt In “leidt vaak tot onzorgvuldige antwoorden”, “leidt” means leads and describes a result or consequence. The expression is followed by “tot” when naming what the action produces.
vaak “vaak” means often and indicates that the consequence is common rather than inevitable. It modifies “leidt” in “leidt vaak tot onzorgvuldige antwoorden”.
onzorgvuldige “onzorgvuldige” means careless or insufficiently careful in “onzorgvuldige antwoorden”. It describes answers that may be given without enough attention because the evaluation is excessive.
antwoorden “antwoorden” means answers in “onzorgvuldige antwoorden”. Here it refers to the responses participants give on the evaluation form.

Grammar Points

Vergrotende trap: bijvoeglijk naamwoord + -er

moeilijker

MOOY-luh-kur

more difficult

De vergrotende trap wordt vaak gevormd met -er: moeilijk wordt moeilijker.

Bijvoeglijk naamwoord vóór een zelfstandig naamwoord krijgt vaak -e

overmatige evaluatie

oh-vur-MAH-tuh-khuh ay-vah-loo-AH-tsee

excessive evaluation

Voor een zelfstandig naamwoord krijgt een bijvoeglijk naamwoord vaak een -e, zoals overmatig → overmatige.

Dutch Vocabulary

belangrijk adj
buh-LAHNG-rik important belangrijker

maar belangrijker

deelnemer noun
DAYL-nay-mur participant deelnemers

of deelnemers de methode later toepassen

meten verb
MAY-tun to measure

We zouden moeten meten

methode noun
may-TOH-duh method

de methode later toepassen

moeilijk adj
MOOY-luk difficult moeilijker

moeilijker te meten

nodig adv
NOH-dikh needed

hebben we meer nodig

reflectienotitie noun
ray-flek-SEE-noh-tee-tsee reflection note reflectienotities

om korte reflectienotities kunnen vragen

tevredenheidsscore noun
tuh-VRAY-duhn-hights-SKOHR satisfaction score tevredenheidsscores

meer nodig dan tevredenheidsscores

toepassen verb
uh-TOH-puh-sun to apply

de methode later toepassen

toepassing noun
uh-TOH-puh-sing application

Toepassing is moeilijker te meten

uitvoering noun
OYT-VOO-ring implementation

na de uitvoering

workshop noun
WURK-shop workshop

Na de workshop

Quiz

Spelling

Tap the letters to spell the word.

to measure

Show Answermeten

needed

Show Answernodig

method

Show Answermethode

participant

Show Answerdeelnemers