Misschien
Misschien means “maybe” and makes the plan to move out uncertain. It can be placed at the beginning of a sentence to qualify the whole statement, as here. A tenant could use it when discussing a possible future decision.
verhuis
Verhuis means “move out” in this sentence and describes the speaker’s possible change of residence. It is used with ik here to state what the speaker may do. This is useful when discussing a possible move with a landlord or housing office.
ik
Ik means “I” and identifies the speaker as the subject of verhuis and wil. It commonly appears before the finite verb in a straightforward main clause, as in this sentence. Use it when describing your own plans, needs, or actions.
maar
Maar means “but” and contrasts the possibility of moving out with the speaker’s wish to handle the notice correctly. It connects two clauses that do not simply follow in the same direction. Use it to introduce a qualification or contrasting point.
wil
Wil means “want” here and expresses the speaker’s intention to handle the notice correctly. It is followed by the infinitive regelen in this sentence. A useful pattern is to place the intended action after this form when stating what you want to do.
de
De is the definite article introducing opzegging, referring to the specific notice or termination being discussed. It forms the noun phrase de opzegging. Use it before a known or specified noun in a similar housing-office context.
opzegging
Opzegging means “notice” or “termination” here, specifically the notice connected with ending the tenancy. In de opzegging, it is the matter the speaker wants to handle correctly. It can be used when discussing the formal ending of a lease.
correct
Correct gives the manner of regelen: the notice should be handled correctly. It appears after de opzegging and before regelen in the phrase de opzegging correct regelen. Use it with an action when emphasizing that something must be done properly.
regelen
Regelen means “handle” or “arrange” and is the action the speaker wants to carry out concerning the notice. It follows wil as an infinitive in this sentence. A useful reuse point is to place the matter being arranged before this action, as with de opzegging correct regelen.
In
In means “in” and places the notice requirements inside the lease document. It introduces the phrase in het huurcontract. Use it before a document or place when saying that information is contained there.
het
Het is the definite article in het huurcontract, referring to the specific lease being discussed. Together with huurcontract it identifies one particular document. Use it before this noun when referring to the relevant lease agreement.
huurcontract
Huurcontract means “lease” or “rental contract” and names the document containing the notice requirements. In this sentence it follows in het and functions as the document in which the information is found. It is useful when discussing rights, duties, or conditions connected with renting.
staan
Staan means “are stated” or “are listed” here: the notice requirements are presented as information contained in the lease. The pattern in this sentence places the document first and the listed information after it. Use this kind of wording when referring to information written in a document.
opzegvereisten
Opzegvereisten means “notice requirements” and refers to the rules for giving notice. Here these requirements are the information stated in the lease. Use the word when asking about the conditions or steps for ending a rental agreement.
kan
Kan means “can” and expresses the speaker’s ability to summarize the requirements. It is followed by the infinitive samenvatten. Use this form to offer or describe the ability to perform an action.
ze
Ze means “them” here and refers back to the opzegvereisten. It is the object of samenvatten, so the speaker can summarize the requirements. Use this pronoun when referring back to already mentioned plural information or things.
samenvatten
Samenvatten means “summarize” and describes reducing the notice requirements to their main points. It follows kan as an infinitive in this sentence. It is useful when offering to present rules or information more briefly.
Graag
Graag means “gladly” here and functions as a polite acceptance of the request to summarize the requirements. As a short reply, it conveys “yes, please do” without repeating the action. Use it when accepting a request or offering to do something willingly.
want
Want means “because” and introduces the reason the speaker asks for a summary: legal wording may be difficult to understand. It connects the explanation directly to the preceding request. Use it before a clause that gives a reason.
juridische
Juridische means “legal” and describes the formuleringen as belonging to legal language. It appears directly before formuleringen in this sentence. Use it before a noun when identifying wording or information as related to law.
formuleringen
Formuleringen means “wording” or “formulations” and refers here to the way legal information is expressed. It is the subject of the statement about being difficult to understand. Use it when discussing the wording of rules, contracts, or other formal texts.
kunnen
Kunnen means “can” and expresses the possibility that the legal formulations are difficult to understand. In this sentence it works with the phrase moeilijk te begrijpen zijn. Use it to describe a possible quality or situation involving a plural subject.
moeilijk
Moeilijk means “difficult” and describes how hard the legal formulations may be to understand. It appears in the construction moeilijk te begrijpen, where the difficulty concerns understanding. Use it before an infinitive phrase when describing an action as difficult.
te
Te marks the infinitive phrase te begrijpen after moeilijk. It helps connect the idea of difficulty with the action of understanding, rather than expressing a separate meaning by itself here. A useful pattern is adjective + te + infinitive for describing how easy or difficult an action is.
begrijpen
Begrijpen means “understand” and names the action that may be difficult in this sentence. It follows te in te begrijpen. Use it when referring to understanding wording, instructions, explanations, or information.
zijn
Zijn completes the phrase moeilijk te begrijpen zijn after kunnen, expressing that the formulations can be difficult to understand. Here it links the subject to the description of its comprehensibility. Use it after a modal when describing what something can be like.
Je
Je means “you” and directly addresses the tenant receiving the housing instruction. It is the subject of moet in this sentence. Use it when giving a person a direct requirement or instruction.
moet
Moet expresses “must” or “need to” and introduces the required action opzeggen. It makes written notice a requirement rather than a suggestion. Use it before an infinitive when stating an obligation or necessary step.
schriftelijk
Schriftelijk means “in writing” and describes how the notice must be given. It modifies opzeggen in schriftelijk opzeggen. Use it when specifying that an action must be documented in written form.
opzeggen
Opzeggen means “give notice” in this housing context and names the action required by the tenant. It follows moet as an infinitive. Use it when discussing formally ending a rental agreement or another arrangement.
en
En means “and” and joins the written-notice requirement with the requirement that the property be returned clean. It links two related instructions in the same sentence. Use it to connect actions, requirements, or pieces of information.
woning
Woning means “home” or “property” and refers here to the rented place being returned. In de woning, it identifies the specific residence involved in the agreement. Use it when discussing a dwelling in a housing or rental context.
schoon
Schoon means “clean” and describes the condition in which the property must be returned. It appears in schoon worden opgeleverd. Use it with a place or object when specifying the required clean condition.
worden
Worden helps form the passive expression worden opgeleverd, showing that the property is to be handed over or returned. After moet, it presents this as a required process. Use it with a participle when describing what must happen to something.
opgeleverd
Opgeleverd means “handed back” or “handed over” here and describes the required return of the property. Together with worden, it forms the passive phrase schoon worden opgeleverd. Use it when discussing the condition or formal handover of a property.
ook
Ook means “also” and adds another concern to the speaker’s wish to handle the notice correctly. It introduces the additional aim of avoiding disputes. Use it when adding a related point or concern.
geschillen
Geschillen means “disputes” and refers to possible disagreements about the property’s condition. Here it is the thing the speaker wants to avoid. Use it when discussing formal or serious disagreements about an issue.
over
Over means “about” or “concerning” and connects geschillen with the topic of normal wear. The phrase geschillen over normal wear identifies what the disputes would concern. Use it after a noun such as disputes when naming the subject of disagreement.
normale
Normale means “normal” and describes the slijtage expected from ordinary use. It appears directly before slijtage in normale slijtage. Use it before a noun when identifying something as usual or expected.
slijtage
Slijtage means “wear and tear” and refers to the gradual effects of ordinary use on the property. In this sentence it is the topic of possible disputes. Use it in rental discussions about the condition of a home or its fixtures.
voorkomen
Voorkomen means “avoid” here and names the action of preventing disputes from arising. It follows wil as an infinitive and takes geschillen as its object. Use it when expressing a goal of avoiding a problem or unwanted situation.
We
We means “we” and identifies the housing office and tenant, or the people involved together, as the subject of kunnen. It introduces the joint possibility of scheduling an inspection. Use it when proposing an action carried out together.
een
Een means “a” or “an” and introduces one inspection that can be scheduled. It appears before inspectie in een inspectie. Use it before a noun when referring to an unspecified individual item or event.
inspectie
Inspectie means “inspection” and refers to the planned check of the property’s condition. It is the object of inplannen in this sentence. Use it when arranging an official or practical examination of a place or object.
inplannen
Inplannen means “schedule” and describes arranging the inspection for a particular time. It follows kunnen as an infinitive. Use it with an appointment, meeting, or inspection when putting it into a schedule.
om
Om means “in order to” and introduces the purpose of the inspection: recording the condition of the property. It is followed by a te-infinitive phrase in this sentence. Use om with an infinitive phrase when explaining the purpose of an action.
staat
Staat means “condition” here and refers to the physical state of the property. The phrase staat van de woning specifies whose condition is meant. Use it when assessing or documenting the condition of a place or object.
vast te leggen
Vast te leggen means “to document” or “to record” the condition. In this construction, vast contributes the idea of fixing or securely establishing something, te marks the infinitive phrase, and leggen contributes the idea of putting it down; together they form the meaning “to record.” Use it when creating a reliable record of a condition, agreement, or fact.
Dat
Dat means “that” and refers to the proposed inspection and documentation from the previous sentence. It is the subject of zou in Dat zou het proces minder stressvol maken. Use it to refer back to an action, idea, or situation just mentioned.
zou
Zou means “would” and presents the effect of the inspection as a likely or hypothetical result. It combines with maken in this sentence. Use it when describing what an action or situation would cause.
proces
Proces means “process” and refers here to the move-out procedure as a whole. It is the object affected by maken. Use it when discussing a series of connected steps or an administrative procedure.
minder
Minder means “less” and reduces the degree of stress described by stressvol. In this sentence it makes the process less stressful. Use it before an adjective or noun when expressing a lower degree or amount.
stressvol
Stressvol means “stressful” and describes the emotional difficulty of the move-out process. With minder, it expresses that the process would cause less stress. Use it to describe a situation, task, or process that creates stress.
maken
Maken means “make” and describes causing the process to become less stressful. It follows zou as an infinitive in this sentence. Use it when an action or circumstance causes something to have a particular quality.
Duidelijke
Duidelijke means “clear” and describes the documentatie as easy to understand or use. It appears before documentatie at the beginning of the sentence. Use it before a noun when emphasizing that information is organized and understandable.
documentatie
Documentatie means “documentation” and refers to the clear records about the property and the move-out process. It is the subject of voorkomt in this sentence. Use it when referring to written or recorded evidence that preserves relevant information.
voorkomt
Voorkomt means “prevents” and states that the documentation stops misunderstandings from occurring. It links duidelijke documentatie with misverstanden. Use it when describing something that keeps an unwanted result from happening.
meestal
Meestal means “usually” and shows that the prevention of misunderstandings is a general tendency rather than an absolute guarantee. It modifies voorkomt in this sentence. Use it when describing what generally happens in common situations.
misverstanden
Misverstanden means “misunderstandings” and refers to incorrect or conflicting interpretations during move-out. It is the result that clear documentation usually prevents. Use it when people may understand an agreement, condition, or responsibility differently.
bij
Bij means “during” or “when” here and places the misunderstandings in the context of leaving the property. It introduces bij het verlaten van de woning. Use it before an event or activity when describing when something happens.
verlaten
Verlaten means “leaving” in the phrase bij het verlaten van de woning. Here it names the act of departing from the property, followed by the thing being left with van. Use it in the pattern het verlaten van when referring to the act of leaving a place or thing.
van
Van means “of” here and connects verlaten with the woning, specifying what is being left. It completes the phrase het verlaten van de woning. Use it after a nominalized action to introduce the person, place, or thing that action concerns.